alan premselaar said:
> my question is, why isn't it being processed by spamassassin? if i have an
> error in my regex, it complains and i see it in my maillog ... but it
> doesn't seem to match
SpamAssassin decodes the headers, that's probably it. Try running
"spamassassin -D -Lt < tstmessag
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 18:01 CET Steve Prior wrote:
> I recently upgraded from 2.4.something to 2.5. I have found that I
> miss a great deal the fact that 2.4.* used to alter the message body
> when it found spam. [...]
We'll release 2.51 tomorrow which has a workaround for this. If you can'
Thanks to all that responded. It was a BIG help :)
Pete
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforg
we have a few problems/questions with spamassassin... first the problem.
we get this when trying to use spamassassin:
: service unavailable. Command output: Can't locate
Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/sun4-solaris
/usr/loca
speaking of which, are there isp-specific lists which distinguish between the isp's
customer netblocks and the isp's internal netblocks?
(the objective being to block smtp-talking clients and force them to relay through
their isp's smtp relays.)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:22:26PM -0800, Christian
If you're wondering why those settings don't affect mail run through
amavisd-new, it is because those settings are fundamentally up to amavis,
not spamassassin.
amavisd-new, mailscanner, and several other tools that call SA directly
don't actualy use the output of SA.. They add the tags and suc
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Sorry, but the AWL is only conceptually valid when applied to a single
> user's mail at a time. Applying it globally to multiple users at a time
has
> a tendency to cause problems, particularly if you ALL_SPAM_TO some users
in
> your network.
In my case, sitewide IS a single
This is probably an easy one, but I'm not able to find anything to
explain the contradiction in the docs.
The auto_learn_threshold_nonspam and auto_learn_threshold_spam configs
are at the defaults (at least I haven't affected them). However, I'm
still getting messages scoring well above the
auto_
Here's the script any comments would be appreciated.
To get going just change
$imapserver = "YOUR IMAP SERVER";
and create a spam and ham directory from your home account (or change
the learn_mail calls to point to shared directories).
calling convention is
./learn-spam.pl -uid="USERNAME" -pw
