Interestingly, in the Razor 2.22 install file, you can install the SDK from
the tarball, or install a list of modules from CPAN.
I installed from the SDK files...but later ran install from CPAN, and found
that some of the modules were not up to date and were installed:
Net::Ping - up to date
Net:
Perhaps you should read closer.. The first one does not match NO_REAL_NAME.
Thus the difference between the two runs is:
3.8 + BAYES_60 + NO_REAL_NAME = 6.0
3.8 + 1.2 +1.0 = 6.0
At 11:07 AM 3/18/2003 +, Darren Coleman wrote:
Hi,
I received two identical emails to two different email addres
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 09:49, Michael Schaap wrote:
> (Note that sometimes (depending on browser? ad filtering? time of day?
> phase of moon?) I don't get the correct page, but instead a redirect to
> web1000search.com or something. Don't know why that happens, but I just
> managed to get the c
Hi,
I'm running SA2.44 on Solaris 2.6, sendmail 8.9.3 ( very ancient, i know..)
and procmail as mailer.
Mailclient is MS Outlook Express ( hiding now...)
My collegues don't want to have a report in the body anymore. All fine, I've
set clear_report_template and deleted SPAM: and "no report header"
Hi,
I received two identical emails to two different email addresses in the
space of a few minutes that are both covered by a single instance of
SpamAssassin, and one of them was deemed to be spam, and the other not.
This in it of itself wouldn't be a massive issue were it not for the fact
that th
"Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's an "agree to disagree"-situation, methinks;
You could completely right and the right course of action would be to
remove all negative scoring rules. Further, I care less about being
right than I do about improving SA. My goal here isn't rea
