Re: [SAtalk] tests=none?

2003-03-01 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, I grabbed one of spams that got through and manually fed it to > spamassassin logged in as him and after some ktracing found that he had > a file called "rules" in his home directory that was a regular text file > with nothing to do with spamassassin.

FW: [SAtalk] Odd score

2003-03-01 Thread Lucas Albers
Your assuming most spammers are smart and are going to got the real technical route. In the long term, yes. Most of them are just in it for the short term buck, and if it's possible to block all the script-spammers with a dsl account, then sa is a good thing. You mentioned that the update time wa

[SAtalk] trying to understand why rule got such a hight value; got flagged on a spam - attached

2003-03-01 Thread Lucas Albers
I got the following spam... Why does the following test, have such a huge minus score to it? SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE (-5.8 points) Long signature present (empty lines) -Original Message- From: John F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 PM To: Subject: Why your