RE: [SAtalk] False positive for foreign language

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Kettler
Hmm, well, it looks like I'll have to agree with the 8bit-header call.. but I think the SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS is incorrect and representative of a genuine SpamAssassin bug. For the 8bit header part, this received: line has an interesting DNS lookup answer for a PTR lookup of 10.91.4.225... can't s

RE: [SAtalk] False positive for foreign language

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Kettler
First, let's not forget RFC's, but I will say that SA is not intended to be a "beat up the emails that don't follow the RFC's" tool, and RFC correctness does not drive the choice of rules for SA. SA's scores are GA evolved against a real corpus of real email. Absolutely no rules are added to S

Re: [SAtalk] HTML only messages

2003-01-24 Thread Kai Schaetzl
SpamTalk wrote on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 18:01:51 -0600: > Too bad we don't have Bill Gates email > address we could CC him on each occurrence. > Actually, HTML was promoted by Netscape before MS did it and as it seems the Mozilla is also the first one to send html-only, Outlook Express doesn't do th

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Logging howto

2003-01-24 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:21:37PM +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > > daemon spamd -d -D -L -S so debug is turned on. > > I couldn't find an uppercase `S' in man spamd so not sure what that > > is doing there. I'll try without it and see what happens. -S used to be "short cut", which was supposed