Michael Moncur wrote on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:07:59 -0700:
> a bunch of HTML newsletters
> and a webmail client or two.
>
Expedia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) does it as well for booking
confirmations :-( Nevertheless I bumped it up to 2.0 and this scored
the only false positive within weeks: Expedia. So,
Isnt it already in place to lower outlook scores? Why not just increase the
score for HTML mails and increase the amount deducted for outlook?
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Bob
Proulx
Enviado el: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:12 PM
Para: [EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would this header ever show up in a legitamte mail?
X-Mailer: PowerMail v2306297
- ---
Randomly Generated Quote:
IMPIETY, n. Your irreverence toward my
deity. -- Ambrose Bierce
Mike L
Hey, I put in the small change to PerMsgStatus.pm to add the X-Spam-Report
for all email, not just spam, so that if I find a false-negative, it is
easier to see what + and - points it *did* get (and not just the RULE names
it matched)... It is pretty trivial, but I wondered if anyone else has yet
First, don't ever edit 60_whitelist.cf if you can avoid it, add your own
stuff to local.cf instead.
60_whitelist.cf, and ever other file in /usr/share/spamassassin/ will be
obliterated without warning when you upgrade SA. Those files are not
intended to be edited for general customization. You
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:43:20 -0500
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:27:03AM -0600, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > They're only in 2.50; 2.50 should be released in a week or two.
>
> FYI: The "official" answer is sometime Q1 2003. :) We're still doing
> bug fixes a