Re: [SAtalk] spam conference webcast (fwd)

2003-01-17 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Friday 17 January 2003 20:39 CET Chris Santerre wrote: >[...] > My connection has been really bad! Like that old joke, It is taking me > 1.5 hours to watch 60 minutes :) *lol* > I haven't even got thru #2 yet! But LOTs of great info! Yeah, there's some interesting stuff. Seems like session 3

Re: [SAtalk] spam conference webcast (fwd)

2003-01-17 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Friday 17 January 2003 19:15 CET Gerald Oskoboiny wrote: > * Malte S. Stretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > Nope, sorry. But can anybody tell me the current time in EST? Is it > > UTC-0500? But then, why was John Graham-Cumming just speaking? > > John Graham-Cumming and John Draper switched places. A

Re: [SAtalk] Another new spammer ploy?

2003-01-17 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Roman Katzer wrote: > How about having SA 'render' the mail and have it work on the rendered > version? This way, things like those comments simply wouldn't matter. I'm 90% certain that SA already does this, and I'm surprised that nobody else has pointed that out (which is wh