I would like to validate in all mails the user with the
nis service.
Is possible??
Bye!
--
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Jose Miguel Herrera M. - User #246070 counter.li.org
jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl
-
Est.Ing.Civil Informática - UTFSM
*.*.*.*.*.*.*
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:04:31PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> Anyone out there have a good way to automate markup removal in Mutt?
> The best I've come up with is a folder-hook for my SPAM trap folder
> that changes the $editor to a script that runs 'spamassassin -d' on
> the file that Mutt giv
On 2003-01-02 18:20:36 -, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Perhaps it's just an old version of date? Mine looks OK:
>
> $ date -R
> Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:19:46 +
>
> $ date --version
> date (coreutils) 4.5.3
date (GNU sh-utils) 2.0
SuSE 8.0 :-(
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.
I've added this to my user_prefs ...
I was actually looking for a way to check the reply-to address and assign a
score - that would be useful. But your suggestion seems more generic.
Though, I'd still be interested to know how to add custom rules to analyze
the reply-to address.
Thanks a lot.
Reg
I just added this to my local config:
body RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/to\.pl\?.*/i
describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL Received from spammer
body RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/od\.pl\?.*/i
describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL Received from spammer
score
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 the voices made Chris Santerre write:
CS> Blocking spam goes like so
CS>
CS> -SMTP(access bd, RBLS, simple header checks, ect)
CS> -Procmail
CS> -SA
CS> -MUA filter
CS> -Delete key :-)
One mustn't forget that one must apply the same kind of logic when one is
writing its pr
Chris Santerre wrote:
So, regarding access db (Theo's) and RBLs Our business has the
unfortunate situation of having to deal with China and Korea. So I'm
wondering if anyone has had problems using either Theo's access.txt and or
the popular RBL services while dealing with these countries? I
Nathan Neulinger said:
> This makes a few of the config options privileged with the following
> thought:
>
> Privileged rules should be those that can impact the system
> performance, but not overall security.
>
> More privileged rules should be those that can impact other
>
Well I'm reading more and more with the slow holiday time. I keep coming
back to Theo and kludge.net as great info. Particularly the post Theo made
about X-Rot version cleared the cloudy skies for me:
Blocking spam goes like so
-SMTP(access bd, RBLS, simple header checks, ect)
-Procmail
-SA
-
All,
I've installed Spamassassin via CPAN. Everything was going fine however at
one point I've got the following message:
t/db_awl_path...Expecting a 'cannot create tmp lockfile'
warning here...
Cannot create tmp lockfile ./log/awl/shouldbeinaccessible.lock : Not a
directory
t/db_
Hello,
I'm seeing a bunch of these errors in my syslog file:
spamd[406]: cannot fork: Not enough space
Okay, so swap is filling up on my mail server for some reason, right?
Problem is,
spamd just dies and the message gets delivered into the INBOX unscanned.
Is there a way to return an error
This makes a few of the config options privileged with the following
thought:
Privileged rules should be those that can impact the system
performance, but not overall security.
More privileged rules should be those that can impact other
users data or can impact th
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered,
> have no embedded images.
>
> error below:
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of thi
SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered,
have no embedded images.
error below:
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C2B322.1E54A940
Content-
Why not just use "report_header 1" and put the spam report in the header,
and "defang_mime 0" to have SA leave the HTML alone, in the first place?
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> Anyone out there have a good way to automate markup removal in Mutt?
> The best I've come up with is a fo
15 matches
Mail list logo