[SAtalk] validation with nis

2003-01-03 Thread Jose M.Herrera
I would like to validate in all mails the user with the nis service. Is possible?? Bye! -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* Jose Miguel Herrera M.     - User #246070 counter.li.org jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl - Est.Ing.Civil Informática - UTFSM *.*.*.*.*.*.*

Re: [SAtalk] Markup Removal in Mutt

2003-01-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:04:31PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > Anyone out there have a good way to automate markup removal in Mutt? > The best I've come up with is a folder-hook for my SPAM trap folder > that changes the $editor to a script that runs 'spamassassin -d' on > the file that Mutt giv

Re: [SAtalk] date -R an anachronism?

2003-01-03 Thread Martin Schroeder
On 2003-01-02 18:20:36 -, Tony Hoyle wrote: > Perhaps it's just an old version of date? Mine looks OK: > > $ date -R > Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:19:46 + > > $ date --version > date (coreutils) 4.5.3 date (GNU sh-utils) 2.0 SuSE 8.0 :-( Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v2.43)

2003-01-03 Thread Somik Raha
I've added this to my user_prefs ... I was actually looking for a way to check the reply-to address and assign a score - that would be useful. But your suggestion seems more generic. Though, I'd still be interested to know how to add custom rules to analyze the reply-to address. Thanks a lot. Reg

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v2.43)

2003-01-03 Thread Donald L. Greer
I just added this to my local config: body RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/to\.pl\?.*/i describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL Received from spammer body RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/od\.pl\?.*/i describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL Received from spammer score

Re: [SAtalk] RBLS w/ known spam sources, Theo, and I'm starting tosee the lig ht!

2003-01-03 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 the voices made Chris Santerre write: CS> Blocking spam goes like so CS> CS> -SMTP(access bd, RBLS, simple header checks, ect) CS> -Procmail CS> -SA CS> -MUA filter CS> -Delete key :-) One mustn't forget that one must apply the same kind of logic when one is writing its pr

Re: [SAtalk] RBLS w/ known spam sources, Theo, and I'm starting tosee the lig ht!

2003-01-03 Thread Rich Puhek
Chris Santerre wrote: So, regarding access db (Theo's) and RBLs Our business has the unfortunate situation of having to deal with China and Korea. So I'm wondering if anyone has had problems using either Theo's access.txt and or the popular RBL services while dealing with these countries? I

Re: [SAtalk] Patch to make some config options privileged

2003-01-03 Thread Justin Mason
Nathan Neulinger said: > This makes a few of the config options privileged with the following > thought: > > Privileged rules should be those that can impact the system > performance, but not overall security. > > More privileged rules should be those that can impact other >

[SAtalk] RBLS w/ known spam sources, Theo, and I'm starting to see the light!

2003-01-03 Thread Chris Santerre
Well I'm reading more and more with the slow holiday time. I keep coming back to Theo and kludge.net as great info. Particularly the post Theo made about X-Rot version cleared the cloudy skies for me: Blocking spam goes like so -SMTP(access bd, RBLS, simple header checks, ect) -Procmail -SA -

[SAtalk] CPAN installation problem

2003-01-03 Thread lukasz
All, I've installed Spamassassin via CPAN. Everything was going fine however at one point I've got the following message: t/db_awl_path...Expecting a 'cannot create tmp lockfile' warning here... Cannot create tmp lockfile ./log/awl/shouldbeinaccessible.lock : Not a directory t/db_

[SAtalk] Not enough space

2003-01-03 Thread Patrick Bores
Hello, I'm seeing a bunch of these errors in my syslog file: spamd[406]: cannot fork: Not enough space Okay, so swap is filling up on my mail server for some reason, right? Problem is, spamd just dies and the message gets delivered into the INBOX unscanned. Is there a way to return an error

[SAtalk] Patch to make some config options privileged

2003-01-03 Thread Nathan Neulinger
This makes a few of the config options privileged with the following thought: Privileged rules should be those that can impact the system performance, but not overall security. More privileged rules should be those that can impact other users data or can impact th

Re: [SAtalk] MIME

2003-01-03 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: > SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered, > have no embedded images. > > error below: > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of thi

[SAtalk] MIME

2003-01-03 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered, have no embedded images. error below: This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C2B322.1E54A940 Content-

Re: [SAtalk] Markup Removal in Mutt

2003-01-03 Thread Mike Burger
Why not just use "report_header 1" and put the spam report in the header, and "defang_mime 0" to have SA leave the HTML alone, in the first place? On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote: > Anyone out there have a good way to automate markup removal in Mutt? > The best I've come up with is a fo