Re: [SAtalk] Possible header test (for after 2.50 :-)

Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I've noticed that I've had a few spams recently where the To: field > includes a DOS-style file path - some examples are: > > To: > To: > To: > To: > To: > > Is anyone else seeing these? I have some hits for this, not a huge number

http://www.stormloader.com/saklad/ (was: [SAtalk] Rmail in emacs.Other web links that help you use the headers fromhttp://spamassassin.org)

* Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes the usual crap... Hmmm... Now, here's a real pity. I wish I'd unlurked for a better reason than Don Saklad. Well, before you answer any of his posts, *PLEASE* read . If you don't, you'll never get rid of him:

[SAtalk] Possible header test (for after 2.50 :-)

Hi all, I've noticed that I've had a few spams recently where the To: field includes a DOS-style file path - some examples are: To: To: To: To: To: Is anyone else seeing these? A rule to spot them is trivial, but will have to wait till after 2.50. header L_TO_FILENAMETo =~ /^h

[SAtalk] Rmail in emacs. Other web links that help you use the headers from http://spamassassin.org

a. For rmail in emacs, once you've got http://spamassassin.org on the whole system, like the system at the universtiy here at this end, what web links are there that you can refer to about how you wort the hundreds of spam commercial messages now with the headers from http://spamassassi

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v2.43)

Or just add sendfree.comREJECT hi-speedmailREJECT to /etc/mail/access Peter *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 31/12/2002 at 3:06 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:17:33AM -0800, Somik Raha wrote: >> checks. I tried modifying it as suggested earlier by Th

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin v. snortmonster's sniffer

On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 18:50, Brian May wrote: > Wel.. I'd say wait for SA 2.50 wiht bayes support.. It will kick > snortmonsters butt.. IMHO.. Agree. I'm currently using sa 2.43 in a feedback loop together with bogofilter (bogofilter is trained according to spamassassin's decision, and bogofilte

Re: [SAtalk] call china spam

On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Just wondering: How much can SA do against this type of spam? Image > recognition is not developed far enough yet :-/ Without the scores being generated yet, 2.50 gives it a 6.1 for me. -- Randomly Generated

[SAtalk] call china spam

Yo! Just wondering: How much can SA do against this type of spam? Image recognition is not developed far enough yet :-/ cheers -- vbi -- featured product: SpamAssassin - http://spamassassin.org --- Begin Message --- --- End Message --- signature.asc Description: This is a digital

[SAtalk] How's 2.50 shaping up?

I'm using SpamAssassin 2.43, and I'm noticing more and more spammers adapting to it and slipping through the cracks. How's 2.50 shaping up? Is the development build stable and reliable enough to use without incident? Is there any general timeframe for when 2.50 might be release-quality? _