Re: [SAtalk] http://www.spamassassin.org

2002-07-21 Thread John Rudd
They appear to be the same page, but until recently I could get to the www. spamassassin.org one, but it hasn't been responsive the last couple days. But then, I also haven't been able to get anyone to answer my questions about user_prefs files (not the one from earlier today, but from a couple

Re: [SAtalk] user_perfs

2002-07-21 Thread Bob Proulx
> Question: > > Is this the correct way to code it? > > # Whitelist and blacklist addresses are now file-glob-style patterns, so > # "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", "*@isp.com", or "*.domain.net" will all work. > whitelist_from *@freelotto.com > whitelist_from *@luckysurf.com That looks correct to me an

Re: [SAtalk] http://www.spamassassin.org

2002-07-21 Thread Bob Proulx
> http://www.spamassassin.org > Is anyone besides me having problems getting to the site? What site is that one? Isn't this site on sourceforge the official home page? http://spamassassin.sourceforge.net/ Bob msg07622/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] Apple, Kmail, Adaptive Rules

2002-07-21 Thread Olivier Nicole
>How would forgeries (e.g. viruses) be detected? Would there be an >"oops-I-didn't-mean-to-submit-that" option somehow? Real viruses are filtered before they reach any mailbox for delivery. Tose two addresses could be accessible only for internal mail. And as a user is using this mechanism to

Re: [SAtalk] Apple, Kmail, Adaptive Rules

2002-07-21 Thread Jeremy Mates
* Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-21T19:18-0700]: > That could be done with only 2 addresses per domain, and let it figure > who did the bounce... How would forgeries (e.g. viruses) be detected? Would there be an "oops-I-didn't-mean-to-submit-that" option somehow? -- Jeremy Mates

Re: [SAtalk] Apple, Kmail, Adaptive Rules

2002-07-21 Thread Olivier Nicole
>false postives/negatives to different e-mailaddresses, but then each user would >need two more e-mailaddresses for each and every account; not to mention that That could be done with only 2 addresses per domain, and let it figure who did the bounce... Olivier -

RE: [SAtalk] user_perfs

2002-07-21 Thread Chris Goh
Hi If you havent already, spamd has to be restarted. Cheers -Original Message- From: James D. Stallings [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[SAtalk] user_perfs I am having troubles setting up the User_Perfs

[SAtalk] user_perfs

2002-07-21 Thread James D. Stallings
I am having troubles setting up the User_Perfs file and I know it is reading them, cause if I change the score value it works based on the changes. My questions has to do with allowing certain domains not to be scanned for spam for a certain mbox. I can not get to the spamassassin.org site t

[SAtalk] http://www.spamassassin.org

2002-07-21 Thread James D. Stallings
Is anyone besides me having problems getting to the site? Jim Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag --- This sf.net email is sponsored

Re: [SAtalk] Gotcha! IP, date and time - you gave me all I need :o)

2002-07-21 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, John Rudd wrote: > I don't think the drug industry is a very good analogy here. The > problem with drug users (in a legal sense) is not their use of drugs, > but the secondary crimes they resort to in supporting their addiction > (if they're addicts). I don't think that app

[SAtalk] Confirm 800710

2002-07-21 Thread John Signorelli