Note that whitelisting from 'root' is probably a bad idea:
593 eep:spam/raw> grep -i "^From: .*root" * | wc
19 56 841
weekly run output, however, is far safer:
595 eep:spam/raw> grep -i 'weekly run' * | wc
0 0 0
-Dave
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 04:58:14PM -060
It appears from what I can see that I have spamc and spamd setup, the
problem is that it doesn't seem to be tagging any spam.
I need a way to see why 'spamc' is failing ? I have procmail set in the
verbose mode but only see info like this:
procmail: [39370] Sat Mar 16 17:38:57 2002
procmail:
On Saturday 16 March 2002 03:56 pm, Jason White wrote:
> Now to my questions: whenever Spamassassin fails to detect a spam
> message (which occasionally happens), I pipe the offending message to
> spamassassin -r
> Is this the correct response? The effect is (or should be) to add the
> message (o
I wish to congratulate the Spamassassin developers upon the creation
of a truly excellent package. I installed Spamassassin, along with
Vipul's Razor, from the corresponding Debian packages, added recipes
to my .procmailrc file as described in the documentation, and it all
worked perfectly without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your initial reccomendation worked after I restarting spamd. I never
realized I had to restart it in order for changes to stick. I think
that should be in the FAQ or in the docs somewhere. Thanks for all
the help though.
Mike Loiterman
[EMAIL PR
Just realized that you did not try:
whitelist_from root
Give it a try. If that doesn't work try this modification to the custom
rule:
header CHARLIE_ROOT From =~ /root/i
describe CHARLIE_ROOT From is Charlie Root
score CHARLIE_ROOT -100.0
OR another:
header CHARLIE_ROOT Subje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've tried a few other regexps with no luck either.
/\Charlie Root \/i
/Charlie.Root/i
/.*Charlie Root.*\/i
/\Charlie Root\/i
Mike Loiterman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:spamas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ugh...its still isn't working. I pasted in what you described into
my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it still is getting tagged as
spam. This thing is unstoppable and its frustrating the heck out of
me. Any other ideas?
Mike Loiterman
[EMAI
Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Is there a way to configure spamassassin to run say, header checks only,
>or body checks only?
>
Not that I know of -- you could set all the non-header checks to zero in
your user_prefs file.
--
http://www.pricegrabber.com | Dog is my co-pilot.
The whitelist_from won't work because the email addres is simply "root" and
doesn't include a domain name. Therefore, you must create your own custom
rule in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
header CHARLIE_ROOT From =~ /Charlie Root/i
describe CHARLIE_ROOT From is Charlie Root
score CHARL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have not been able to get any whitelist entries to work for this:
From: Charlie Root
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:25 AM
To: root
Subject: fat_man.ascendency.net weekly run output
Cleaning up kernel database files:
Rebuilding locate databas
Hi,
>
>To be erased from our list please write [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with "erased" in the subject line
>
>
>
> It seems like this particular spammer is "erasing" instead
* Mike Loiterman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My weekly reports from my server are getting tagged as SPAM. How
> can I effectively whitelist this without opening up a hole in my
> defenses..??
Unless you're using SpamAssassin to do delivery, filter them out before
you pass through spamassassin.
Add a whitelist_from entry in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or
perhaps a custom rule that looks for a unique Subject and scores the message
with a -100. See man page Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf for details.
==
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My weekly reports from my server are getting tagged as SPAM. How can
I effectively whitelist this without opening up a hole in my
defenses..??
From: Charlie Root
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:25 AM
To: root
Subject: fat_man.ascendency.net wee
Hey Duncan:
Thanks for the tip! It works fine. Now to figure out how to get the
emails bounced right away (or simply rejected at the SMTP level)
Regards,
Kenneth
---
Kenneth Chen
Unit Supervisor, Clark Kerr and UVA
Residential Computing
University of Californi
--On Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:51 AM -0800 Matthew Cline
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written:
>> Here is the entry from my log files:
>> 2002-03-16 01:24:29.886330500 delivery 685: success:
>> razor_check_skipped:__undefined_Razor::Client/did_0+0+1/
>
> Are you using Razor 1.20? I
On Saturday 16 March 2002 12:31 am, Robert Fleming wrote:
> I installed Razor as per the docs, and get an error when it is called by
> spam-assassin
>
> Here is the entry from my log files:
> 2002-03-16 01:24:29.886330500 delivery 685: success:
> razor_check_skipped:__undefined_Razor::Client/did_0
I installed Razor as per the docs, and get an error when it is called by
spam-assassin
Here is the entry from my log files:
2002-03-16 01:24:29.886330500 delivery 685: success:
razor_check_skipped:__undefined_Razor::Client/did_0+0+1/
I can see the razor files in my perl lib directory
If anybo
19 matches
Mail list logo
