Hello,
I just release a patch for "Mail-SpamAssassin-2.11", Just fix the mime multi-part
process question. Hope anybody can help me test it, Check is it work.
In the origin SpamAssassin-2.11, It can't handle the multi-part mail send the
outlook express, and Can't handle the line brea
With MIMEDefang you can easily update the subject field after calling
Spamassassin (with MIMEDefang). Get more info here:
http://thompsonic.com/util/antispam/mimedefang.html
Jeffrey Thompson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Chen
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:14:41PM -0800, Kenneth Chen wrote:
> Is there a way we can put the score in the subject?
>
> ie: * SPAM 17.3/7 *
>
> or something to that effect? Further, someone on this same thread
> mentioned that they bounce anything with scores above 17 at the SMTP
> leve
I use the following recipes in my .procmailrc file:
:0w: reportedspam.lck
* ^From:.*annoying.*spam.*source
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r -l /home/mydir/reportedspam
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -a -P
This worked great until I upgraded from 2.0 to 2.11. Now, mail that matches the
first procmail r
Is there a way we can put the score in the subject?
ie: * SPAM 17.3/7 *
or something to that effect? Further, someone on this same thread
mentioned that they bounce anything with scores above 17 at the SMTP
level. How do you go about configuring something like that?
Kenneth
Hi,
I want to run spamassassin on a copy of my mail spool and have it pump
out a duplicate spool, only with spam marked out per regular operation.
Before I haul off and either modify it to do this or create some other
dumb perl script to work in combination with spamassassin, is there an
easy w
On Friday 15 March 2002 06:31 pm, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > I recently received some personal mail with the following
> > HotMail-generated ad. at the end (linebreaks are mine):
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to
> > share and print your photos: > href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmt
> I recently received some personal mail with the following
> HotMail-generated ad. at the end (linebreaks are mine):
>
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to
> share and print your photos: href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag3_etl_EN.asp'>Click
> Here
I actually have -ve-scoring tests for
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:13:06PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >> Trying to set up aliases to spamassassin -W and spamassassin -R
> >> but they don't seem to work. I get this error.
> >>
> >
> >How are you setting up alises? What softwar
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:07:34PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:37:51PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 15,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Trying to set up aliases to spamassassin -W and spamassassin -R
>> but they don't seem to work. I get this error.
>>
>
>How are you setting up alises? What software are you using? How are
>your users set up? etc. etc. We probably need to know th
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:37:51PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I put S
On Fri Mar 15 at 02:38:01 PM, Rob McMillin wrote:
> from the eggs-bacon-and-50-dollars-please dept.
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/15/1956200&mode=nested&tid=111
There are lots of lawsuits going on here in Washington against spammers, and
the spammers are losing.
As far as I can te
from the eggs-bacon-and-50-dollars-please dept.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/15/1956200&mode=nested&tid=111
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Dog is my co-pilot.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> > > proble
What did you do, if you don't mind me asking? I'm sure some of my
hacks have been uglier than yours :)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:14:27AM -0500, Jim Holmes wrote:
> It works that way for me too. I'm not sure why. The hack that I did they
> showed up in the body of the message, but it was an ugl
> "Nigel" == Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Interesting, I though I'd give it a go.
Nigel> I've just been playing with the exim spamassassin config I
Nigel> have and made an interesting change that might be useful to
Nigel> people.
Nigel> # in transports
On 15 March 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said:
> In my case I use maildrop and deliver to Maildirs. I assume that maildrop
> handles the file locking properly. But on occasion I do see the messed up
> messages like I posted yesterday. I am using maildrop v1.3.6.
If you're using Maildir, y
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 08:43:09AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> >
> >Wouldn't an easier fix be:
> >
> >/^([A-Z]|[^a-z])*$/
> >
> Interesting. [^a-z] includes [A-Z]. It also matches a zero-length
> string. How about
>
> /^(?:[A-Z]|[^A-Za-z])+$/
Is one of these fixes goi
> "eh" == ed henderson writes:
>> Thanks, I had already tried that, I opened two xterms, one I ran spamd
>> using 'spamd -D -p 2700' and the other 'spamc -c -p 2700'
>>
>> The xterm running spamd, gives a lot of info which looks correct
>> it found the config files. etc
> "gw" == Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
gw> On 14 March 2002, Ray Curtis said:
>>
>> I am trying to get SA setup on a Freebsd system and have so far gotten
>> spamd up and running and using the correct config files.
>> However now I am having a problem with spamc.
> My setup is using procmail; question for you guys: are the incoming
> mails getting clobbered arriving near each other in time? I have a
> number of cron jobs on our servers that all occur simultaneously that
> launches a bunch of mail messages, some of which arrive intact, some of
> which don't
I've just been playing with the exim spamassassin config I have and made
an interesting change that might be useful to people.
This config is for an SA picking up all incoming mail, no per user
specials (because all mail goes through once and SA can't handle
multiple configs in a single pass).
T
On 15 March 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> problems -- I grabbed the .tgz, ran the perl Makefile.PL, noted that
> I needed a gdm lib, found the right package, apt-get'd it (yes, the
> Potato libgdm-dev works nicely) and ran th
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> > problems -- I grabbed the .tgz, ran the perl Makefile.PL, noted that
> > I needed a
I've noticed that there is a bulk email program that
seems to do this. I assume it is a bug in their
software. When they are using the open relay, they
put a line feed somewhere in the header and the mailer
interprets that as the beginning of the body.
I get a couple of these a week on my hotma
On 15 March 2002, Mike Loiterman said:
> Trying to set up aliases to spamassassin -W and spamassassin -R but
> they don't seem to work. I get this error.
What happens when you run "spamassassin -W < testmsg" at the command-line?
>
> - - - - - - The following addresses had permanent fatal e
Jason Purdy wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Trying to build SpamAssassin 2.01 and I get the following output when making
>a test (failing for dir_based_whitelist tests):
>
>[root@www Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01]# make test
>PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Ibli
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:26:11PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> >
> > > Dear all
Bart Schaefer wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Michael Moncur wrote:
>
>>Here's my file of rules for stock-market spam.
>>
>
>Almost all of my stock-market spam lately comes from (in order of
>decreasing volume)
>
>stockadvisor.ws
>stockgroup.com
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>but SA is already catching all
>
> Hate to sound like the boy who cried wolf, but *that* definitely sounds
> like a locking problem. Is procmail delivering to an mbox file? If so,
> does the delivery recipe lock the file?
>
> Read "man procmailrc" for procmail's locking syntax. Like everything
> procmail, it's cryptic and no
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:47:08AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've posted this three times already, but nobody has answered. Is
> this a configuration problem or a bug?
Perhaps you haven't given us enough info -- that may be why nobody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to build SpamAssassin 2.01 and I get the following output when making
a test (failing for dir_based_whitelist tests):
[root@www Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01]# make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib
- -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6
Greg Ward wrote:
>On 15 March 2002, Rob McMillin said:
>
>>My setup is using procmail; question for you guys: are the incoming
>>mails getting clobbered arriving near each other in time? I have a
>>number of cron jobs on our servers that all occur simultaneously that
>>launches a bunch of mail
On 15 March 2002, Olivier Nicole said:
> I am writting a small script that will send email to my users.
>
> I want the email message not to be checked by SA.
>
> I am wondering if there is any way to do so. I am using
> procmail/spamc/spamd.
You could tweak your procmail instructions so that me
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Here's my file of rules for stock-market spam.
Almost all of my stock-market spam lately comes from (in order of
decreasing volume)
stockadvisor.ws
stockgroup.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but SA is already catching all of it, so I haven't bothered creatin
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Michael Moncur wrote:
> This is the first, a bunch of rules to catch MLM and other "business
> opportunity" spams.
Almost anything that uses the word "downline", particularly in conjunction
with "grow", "increase", "improve", etc., is in my experience MLM spam.
___
On 14 March 2002, Ray Curtis said:
>
> I am trying to get SA setup on a Freebsd system and have so far gotten
> spamd up and running and using the correct config files.
> However now I am having a problem with spamc. I get the error:
>
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgdbm.so.2" not
On 15 March 2002, Rob McMillin said:
> My setup is using procmail; question for you guys: are the incoming
> mails getting clobbered arriving near each other in time? I have a
> number of cron jobs on our servers that all occur simultaneously that
> launches a bunch of mail messages, some of wh
I'm using SA 2.11 with Razor 1.20, Postfix and
spamproxy. My spamproxy processes kept dying. I tracked the problem
down to them receiving an ALRM signal from somewhere. As far as I can
tell, that alarm is initiated from SA.
The two places I see an alarm set in SA are DNS.pm
and Reporter
It works that way for me too. I'm not sure why. The hack that I did they
showed up in the body of the message, but it was an ugly hack job.
-jlh
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 9:16 AM -0600 Dennis Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried this the other night, but the SPAM: reporting lines alw
I tried this the other night, but the SPAM: reporting lines always
ended up in the headers instead of the body. It doesn't do this
if I use Procmail or MailAudit for delivery instead. Is this
normal?
Sorry, I just started using SpamAssassin a couple days ago.
Thanks,
Denny
On Fri, Mar 15, 2
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 7:12 PM +0800 Jason Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
> all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
> Exchange).
Jason,
Take a look at spamproxyd in the spamas
If it'd be the same subject all the time, you could weight that subject
with a really big negative number in the rules and then SA will pass it
through...
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:26:11PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
>
> > Dear all - thanks for the great support. I have (manually) applied the
> > above patch
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> > Finally, it *doesn't matter* -- I bet that using Perl's linker flags for
> > spamc is unnecessary and irrelevant. So here's my third and final
> > Makefile.PL patc
> I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
> all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
> Exchange).
I use the content filtering facility in Postfix.
I get Postfix to call procmail as the content filter and then use
procmail to call sp
Howdy,
I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
Exchange).
I've had a quick look at the Spamassassin Pages and checked Deja but I
can't find any good reference to anyone who's doing this.
On Friday 15 March 2002 12:11 am, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Here's my file of rules for stock-market spam. I tried to avoid anything
> that would be used in "normal" mail, but people who subscribe to stock
> reports could get false positives. I used a bunch of low-scoring rules
> rather than fewer h
Henrik Enberg wrote:
>"CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>I am using SA 2.11 and sometimes see messages that are messed up - all of
>>the headers appear in the body of the message and the From: and To: headers
>>are empty. This has happened very infrequently but I wond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've posted this three times already, but nobody has answered. Is
this a configuration problem or a bug?
Any help would be apprecaited.
Trying to set up aliases to spamassassin -W and spamassassin -R but
they don't seem to work. I get this error
51 matches
Mail list logo
