as it invented? Did the POSIX folks come up with
>> something good for a change?
>
> Ditto - which probably means it is less portable that -print0 :-)
New to me too, but it appears to work fine on Solaris 10, GNU findutils (thus
Linux), and NetBSD.
--
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com
pgpuc9ZO0modi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/ recurse=true of=mytree/
>
> After all, all you have to do to implement this is open a pipe to ftp
> or wget.
Actually, neat idea (at least the first one)...
--
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com
pgpTopM5vOIzq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
but it's simply incorrect to suggest that what you ask for
_is_ the current policy (much less to accuse one of the originators of
the current policy of being `ignorant' of what that policy is).
Just sayin'...
--
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com
pgpE7qnFDPZoR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:19:46AM -0400, Jim Wise wrote:
>> As long as I remember, we've had a strict policy of submitting changes
>> upstream where possible, but of _not_ gating fixes on this process --
>> particularly fixes which a
Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:57:53AM -0400, Jim Wise wrote:
>> And the project has a long history of making sure all (these days: most)
>> code in the base distribution builds with -Wall -Werror. This isn't
>> because every GCC warning i
