On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:43:02AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Arguably, the atf test include/t_paths could have been updated to check
> for the specific error ENODEV and treat that as a PASS.
Minor nit: it should skip, not pass.
Martin
Yes, if each entry in the path array were treated as a separate test
case, then we could certainly skip the sysmon/power/wdog entries if the
open returns ENODEV.
However, there is one big list of paths, all tested in a single test
case. It would not make sense to report the entire test case a