On Oct 11, 4:10pm, "David Laight" wrote:
}
} Module Name: src
} Committed By: dsl
} Date: Mon May 21 21:34:16 UTC 2012
}
} Modified Files:
} src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib: exec.c
} src/sys/arch/sandpoint/stand/altboot: main.c
} src/sys/lib/libsa: ext2fs.c ffsv1.c ffsv2.c
On Wed, 30 May 2012, John Nemeth wrote:
Just because all shipping kernels are currently required to
contain ffs doesn't mean a user can't build a kernel without it
"knowing" that /boot will load the appropriate module. At the very
least, this should have been a knob so that people can build
In article ,
Paul Goyette wrote:
>On Wed, 30 May 2012, John Nemeth wrote:
>
>> Just because all shipping kernels are currently required to
>> contain ffs doesn't mean a user can't build a kernel without it
>> "knowing" that /boot will load the appropriate module. At the very
>> least, this s
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:11:09PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
> On Oct 11, 4:10pm, "David Laight" wrote:
> }
> } Module Name:src
> } Committed By: dsl
> } Date: Mon May 21 21:34:16 UTC 2012
> }
> } Modified Files:
> } src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib: exec.c
> } src
