On 18 April 2011 04:21, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>> > Module Name: src
>> > Committed By: rmind
>> > Date: Mon Apr 18 03:04:31 UTC 2011
>> >
>> > Modified Files:
>
On 18 April 2011 08:00, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 04:21, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>> Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>>> > Module Name: src
>>> > Committed By: rmind
>>> > Date:
On 18.04.2011 09:23, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 08:00, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>> On 18 April 2011 04:21, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>>> Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Co
On 18 April 2011 09:04, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 18.04.2011 09:23, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>> On 18 April 2011 08:00, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>>> On 18 April 2011 04:21, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasi
On 18.04.2011 05:04, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: rmind
> Date: Mon Apr 18 03:04:31 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/xen/xen: balloon.c
>
> Log Message:
> balloon_xenbus_attach: use KM_SLEEP for allocation.
>
> Note: please do not us
"Cherry G. Mathew" wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Module Name: src
> >>> > Committed By: rmind
> >>> > Date: Mon Apr 18 03:04:31 UTC 2011
> >>> >
> >>> > Modified Files:
> >>> > src/sys/arch/xen/xen
Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 18.04.2011 05:04, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: rmind
> > Date: Mon Apr 18 03:04:31 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/xen/xen: balloon.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > balloon_xenbus_att
On 18.04.2011 10:35, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> We used to check the return of big size allocations, when kmem(9) could
> fail even with KM_SLEEP due to KVA starvation. However, pretty much all
> kernel does not perform checks for smaller allocations and since the bug
> was fixed - we are no
On Apr,Monday 18 2011, at 10:26 AM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> "Cherry G. Mathew" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:04:32AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
> wrote:
>> Module Name:src
>> Committed By: rmind
>> Date: Mon Apr 18 03:04:31 UTC 2
Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 18.04.2011 10:35, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > We used to check the return of big size allocations, when kmem(9) could
> > fail even with KM_SLEEP due to KVA starvation. However, pretty much all
> > kernel does not perform checks for smaller allocations and sinc
10 matches
Mail list logo