On Sep 22, 4:01pm, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage
| i'm confused. the version we install has all netbsd-code and does
| not use libbfd, and none of the code has gpl copyright. what part
| of it is not gpl free that taints the
Christos Zoulas writes:
> In article <17305.1474483...@splode.eterna.com.au>,
> matthew green wrote:
> >> Added Files:
> >>src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c
> >
> >bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source
> >belongs in src/external/gpl3.
> >
> >i underst
In article <17305.1474483...@splode.eterna.com.au>,
matthew green wrote:
>> Added Files:
>> src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c
>
>bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source
>belongs in src/external/gpl3.
>
>i understand that the version we install is bfd f
> Added Files:
> src/usr.sbin/mdsetimage: bin.h bin_bfd.c bin_nlist.c
bin_bfd.c is the bfd aka GPL client. that individual source
belongs in src/external/gpl3.
i understand that the version we install is bfd free, but the
tools version is not, and thus the viral aspect of this becomes
murk
