FYI, my earlier commit for changing the MODULE_HOOK macros also
commented out the hvkvp entry for amd64/GENERIC.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, NONAKA Kimihiro wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: nonaka
Date: Fri Mar 1 12:23:10 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Comment out npf for now, as we can't have both NPF and PF in the
same kernel
It used to be possible to have npf and pf in the same kernel. The
kernel I am running now (built a few weeks ag
On 11/23/13 4:50 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Zitat von Jeff Rizzo :
Module Name:src
Committed By:riz
Date:Fri Nov 22 18:58:01 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Comment out npf for now, as we can't have both NPF and PF in the
same kernel - rmind h
Zitat von Jeff Rizzo :
Module Name:src
Committed By: riz
Date: Fri Nov 22 18:58:01 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Comment out npf for now, as we can't have both NPF and PF in the
same kernel - rmind has said he'll address this eventual
On Oct 23, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:37:15AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: matt
>>> Date: Wed Oct 23 17:26:08 UTC 2013
>>>
>>> Modified Files
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:37:15AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:matt
> >Date:Wed Oct 23 17:26:08 UTC 2013
> >
> >Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC XEN3_DOM0
> >
> >Log Messag
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: matt
Date: Wed Oct 23 17:26:08 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC XEN3_DOM0
Log Message:
Add xhci device
When do we get a xhci(4) man page? :)
-
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:40:42AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sat Apr 7 05:40:42 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>
> Log Message:
> add apple autodiscovery
That needs to be added to the ALL conf
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 29.08.11 14:53, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> >> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Module
Am 29.08.11 14:53, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
>>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: mbalmer
Date:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> >> Module Name: src
> >> Committed By: mbalmer
> >> Date: Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
> >>
> >> Modif
Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:mbalmer
>> Date:Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Enab
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mbalmer
> Date: Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>
> Log Message:
> Enable some gpio devices.
Is onewire(4) really something to be enab
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:47:18AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > > Whether or not "available as a module" is a good reason for
> > > removing something from GENERIC
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:23:57AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Sorry, but this is just plain stupid. I could as well make so my work
> > won't work in a modular kernel, and we'll have incompatible features.
>
> Of course it will
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Sorry, but this is just plain stupid. I could as well make so my work
> won't work in a modular kernel, and we'll have incompatible features.
Of course it will work in non-modular kernels, but you just have to add it
there manually.
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:16:11AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:47:18AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > > > Whether or not "available
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:47:18AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > > Whether or not "available as a module" is a good reason for
> > > removing something from GENERIC
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:47:18AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > Whether or not "available as a module" is a good reason for
> > removing something from GENERIC is a separate topic which I will
> > not consider in this message.
>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> Whether or not "available as a module" is a good reason for
> removing something from GENERIC is a separate topic which I will
> not consider in this message.
Fortunately, people can vote with their own work; henceforth all drivers
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
Log Message:
remove dtv (available as a module)
If you remove anything from GENERIC on the grounds that it
is available as a module, then please add the same item to
MONOLITHIC, so that MONOL
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 02:45:54PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jakllsch
> Date: Thu Aug 4 14:45:54 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
>
> Log Message:
> Add coram(4).
Can we get manual pages for these?
- Jukka.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:17:43 +0900, Masao Uebayashi
wrote:
IMHO, for x86, the kernel cannot assume that the bootloader loaded
certain modules, nor can the bootloader expect that kernel XYZ is in
a
specific configuration. They should be agnostic from one another.
I think that TRT here is that
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:29:25PM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 13.02.2011 14:42, David Laight wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:37:21AM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> >> Module Name: src Committed By: jym Date: Sun Feb
> >> 13 04:37:21 UTC
> >> 2011
> >>
>
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Wording seems a bit redundant, so I condensed this into:
Index: man/man9/module.9
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/share/man/man9/module.9,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.26 mo
On 13.02.2011 17:02, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>
>> ...
>> For order of preference, see module(7):
>>
>>The loader will look first for a built-in module with the specified
>>name that has not been disabled (see module_unload() below). If a
>>bui
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
...
For order of preference, see module(7):
The loader will look first for a built-in module with the specified
name that has not been disabled (see module_unload() below). If a
built-in module with that name is not found, the list of module
On 13.02.2011 14:42, David Laight wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:37:21AM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> Module Name: src Committed By: jym Date: Sun Feb 13
>> 04:37:21 UTC
>> 2011
>>
>> Modified Files: src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>>
>> Log Message: Compile FFS an
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:37:21AM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jym
> Date: Sun Feb 13 04:37:21 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>
> Log Message:
> Compile FFS and NFS statically (e.g. not modular) for GENERIC. Thes
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:30:17AM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> > EXEC_ELF32, _SCRIPT # obvious
> > FFS, CD9660, MFS, TMPFS, NFS, EXT2FS
>
> FFS should be compiled into the kernel. But I doubt that somebody uses
> both MFS and TMPFS. I hardly ever use CD9660 or EXT2FS while I use
> NFS
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:40:00AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>
> BTW, I wonder whether modules shouldn't be part of the kern-GENERIC.tgz
> set. But this is an orthogonal issue.
As is building the modules as part of the kernel build, and having the
kernel build include a kernel.o stage into w
On 11.02.2011 07:30, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:06:43AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> Indeed, it would be good to have at least some exec formats and
>> file-systems builtin by default in GENERIC:
>>
>> EXEC_ELF32, _SCRIPT # obvious
>> FFS, CD9660, MFS, TMPFS, NFS, EX
> both MFS and TMPFS. I hardly ever use CD9660 or EXT2FS while I use
> NFS a lot. There will however be people with is opposite requirements
> which is why those should really be modules.
For install, root on CD9660 is possible.
(though we can put cd9660.kmod into the cd9660fs)
> > e.g. the typic
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 05:02:23PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> My "totally modular" kernel config file contains
>
> ...
> no options EXEC_ELF64
> no options EXEC_SCRIPT
> no options COREDUMP
> no options AIO
> no options MQUEUE
>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:06:43AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Indeed, it would be good to have at least some exec formats and
> file-systems builtin by default in GENERIC:
>
> EXEC_ELF32, _SCRIPT # obvious
> FFS, CD9660, MFS, TMPFS, NFS, EXT2FS
FFS should be compiled into the kernel. But I
On 11.02.2011 02:02, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, matthew green wrote:
>>> I'm not 100% sure it is worth having FFS and ELF support as modules
>>> in GENERIC.
>>> It may be nice that they CAN be modules, but I suspect 99.99% of systems
>>> will need them.
>>> Anyone who wants them as
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, matthew green wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jym
Date: Thu Feb 10 16:49:19 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: INSTALL
Log Message:
For i386, include MONOLITHIC for INSTALL rather than GENERIC. While here,
remove drm drivers, we
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: jym
> > Date: Thu Feb 10 16:49:19 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/i386/conf: INSTALL
> >
> > Log Message:
> > For i386, include MONOLITHIC for INSTALL rather than GENERIC. While here,
> > remove drm drivers,
On 10.02.2011 22:23, David Laight wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:jym
>> Date:Thu Feb 10 16:49:19 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: INSTALL
>>
>> Log Message:
>> For i
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jym
> Date: Thu Feb 10 16:49:19 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: INSTALL
>
> Log Message:
> For i386, include MONOLITHIC for INSTALL rather than GENERIC. While
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +, Chuck Silvers wrote:
[...]
> @@ -740,6 +740,10 @@
> spdmem* at iic? addr 0x51
> spdmem* at iic? addr 0x52
> spdmem* at iic? addr 0x53
> +spdmem* at iic? addr 0x54
> +spdmem* at iic? addr 0x55
> +spdmem* at iic? addr 0x56
> +spdmem* at iic? addr 0x57
> s
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:01:39AM -0400, Elad Efrat wrote:
>>> Log Message:
>>> Build NiLFS(2).
>>
>> (2)? :-p
>
> That's how it's written in the configuration file...
That seems... odd.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
David Holland wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:39:16AM +, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Log Message:
> Build NiLFS(2).
(2)? :-p
That's how it's written in the configuration file...
-e.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:39:16AM +, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Log Message:
> Build NiLFS(2).
(2)? :-p
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
44 matches
Mail list logo
