Fixed,
christos
> On Aug 4, 2024, at 6:52 PM, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 13:18:01 -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
>> It should say acct_process(9), but we don't have a man page for it
>> (yet).
>
> A dangling reference is much better than the current incorrect and
> con
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 13:18:01 -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> It should say acct_process(9), but we don't have a man page for it
> (yet).
A dangling reference is much better than the current incorrect and
confusing wording. Please, can you fix it?
> > On Aug 4, 2024, at 1:02 PM, Valery Usha
It should say acct_process(9), but we don't have a man page for it (yet).
christos
> On Aug 4, 2024, at 1:02 PM, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 19:49:06 -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/share/man/man5: acct.5
>>
>> Log Message:
>> PR/58515: Kou
On 23-06-11 15:38, Valery Ushakov wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 22:19:42 +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
| > My goal is to get the mk.conf(5) up to date and correct, and more usable.
| > I intend to remove the duplication in BUILDING and bsd.README
| > and refer back to mk.conf(5) to avoid th
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 22:19:42 +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> | I'm not sure what do you mean. The difference between .Ss and .Sh is
> | only the indent:
>
> Ahh, you're right, I misspoke. Tired brain when working on the commit.
>
> IMHO, they both suffer from lack of blank line there, wher
On 23-06-11 14:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:44:33 +, Luke Mewburn wrote:
|
| > Module Name: src
| > Committed By: lukem
| > Date: Sun Jun 11 10:44:33 UTC 2023
| >
| > Modified Files:
| > src/share/man/man5: mk.conf.5
| >
|
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:44:33 +, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: lukem
> Date: Sun Jun 11 10:44:33 UTC 2023
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: mk.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
[...]
> Change sub headings to headings; it's easier to read.
> (I don't k
> Note that `entropy' is not an `rcvar' the way upsdriver is (if your
ah! i missed this, and wasn't really even thinking about
more than foo and foo_flags. thanks!
.mrg.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 14:46:46 +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Tweak wording for consistency: `if empty or not set', not `if unset'.
>
> is this correct?
>
> rc complains if unset or not set (ie, if "$foo" is zero length):
>
> /etc/rc.d/upsdriver: WARNING: $upsdriver is not s
> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:46:46 +1100
> from: matthew green
>
> > Log Message:
> > Tweak wording for consistency: `if empty or not set', not `if unset'.
>
> is this correct?
>
> rc complains if unset or not set (ie, if "$foo" is zero length):
>
> /etc/rc.d/upsdriver: WARNING: $upsdriver is n
> Log Message:
> Tweak wording for consistency: `if empty or not set', not `if unset'.
is this correct?
rc complains if unset or not set (ie, if "$foo" is zero length):
/etc/rc.d/upsdriver: WARNING: $upsdriver is not set properly - see rc.conf(5).
.mrg.
On 03/10/2012 10:45, Alan Barrett wrote:
The single instance dhcpcd already accepts messages
dhcpcd #start dhcpcd up
dhcpcd -x bgeo # Stop dhcpcd on the bge0 interface
dhcpcd -n iwi0 # Restart dhcpcd on the iwi0 interface
Works just fine.
Can this be combined with something like "denyinterfac
None of these may be attractive to you personally, but this simple
change would cut out about 80% of the support requests I get and
that's
quite attractive to me.
Can't we have the best of both worlds by allowing dhcpcd to receive
messages
to configure interfaces as rc parses interface config
In article <5646969d27e506c74bfd96e9ba791...@mail.marples.name>,
Roy Marples wrote:
>On 02/10/2012 23:23, matthew green wrote:
>>> Committed By: roy
>>> Date: Tue Oct 2 09:18:59 UTC 2012
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
>>>
>>> Log M
On 02/10/2012 23:23, matthew green wrote:
Committed By: roy
Date: Tue Oct 2 09:18:59 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
Log Message:
Discourage the use of ifconfig_bge0=dhcp and prefer setting
dhcpcd=YES
in rc.conf(5) instead.
can you e
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:23:39 +1000, matthew green wrote:
>> Committed By:roy Date: Tue Oct 2 09:18:59 UTC
2012
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Discourage the use of ifconfig_bge0=dhcp and prefer setting dhcpc
> Committed By: roy
> Date: Tue Oct 2 09:18:59 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
> Discourage the use of ifconfig_bge0=dhcp and prefer setting dhcpcd=YES
> in rc.conf(5) instead.
can you explain why?
i actually really lik
On 02/10/2012 16:58, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
Log Message:
Discourage the use of ifconfig_bge0=dhcp and prefer setting
dhcpcd=YES
in rc.conf(5) instead.
It would be worth to also note about dhcpcd(8) (instead of
dhclient(8))
i
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: ifconfig.if.5 rc.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
> Discourage the use of ifconfig_bge0=dhcp and prefer setting dhcpcd=YES
> in rc.conf(5) instead.
It would be worth to also note about dhcpcd(8) (instead of dhclient(8))
in afterboot(8) and src/distrib/notes/co
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jkoshy
> Date: Sun Sep 30 03:48:16 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: mk.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
> Document build knobs MKBSDTAR, MKCLEANSRC, MKCLEANVERIFY, MKCOMPAT,
>> +.It Sy MKCOMPAT
>> +.YorN
>> +Indicates whether support for
In article <4eb84f56.6060...@netbsd.org>,
Marc Balmer wrote:
>Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
The majority of interesting programs already
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:36:22PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >>> The majority of interesting programs alrea
Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>> The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
>>
>> But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
>
> But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE_SSP.
It is stronger.
Joerg
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE_SSP.
- Jukka.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 07.11.11 09:24, schrieb Matthias Scheler:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> >>> Module Name: src
> >>> Committed By:
Am 07.11.11 09:24, schrieb Matthias Scheler:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: tron
>>> Date: Sun Nov 6 22:34:48 UTC 2011
>>>
>>> M
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: tron
> > Date: Sun Nov 6 22:34:48 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/man/man5: mk.c
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tron
> Date: Sun Nov 6 22:34:48 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: mk.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
> Stack-smash protection is not enabled by default, at least not for
>
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 03:53:42PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Sat May 15 15:53:42 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: veriexec.5
>
> Log Message:
> Minor markup improvements.
The version before your change was how
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:32:43AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > For the non-German speaking users: I am strongly wondering why the groff
> > HTML output can't even do quoting of input correctly.
>
> Perhaps the html backend just needs improvements. Theoretically, for
> troff, '<', '>', and '&
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:24:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:13:59AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:18:23PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > > Module Name: src
> > > Committed By: wiz
> > > Date: Fri Apr 10 1
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:13:59AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:18:23PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: wiz
> > Date: Fri Apr 10 18:18:23 UTC 2009
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/man/man5: ld
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:18:23PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Fri Apr 10 18:18:23 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man5: ld.so.conf.5
>
> Log Message:
> New sentence, new line. Use Sq for quoting single characters. Quote
34 matches
Mail list logo
