On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:41:03PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:christos
> Date:Tue Dec 6 18:41:03 UTC 2016
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/net: linkaddr.c
>
> Log Message:
> Fix buffer copy without checking the size of
On 21/09/2016 13:10, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> Adding ifa_addrflags definition to src/include/ifaddrs.h is required?
It is! I forgot that file from my commit, fixed now.
Roy
Hi,
Adding ifa_addrflags definition to src/include/ifaddrs.h is required?
From: "Roy Marples" , Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:53:24 +
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: roy
> Date: Wed Sep 21 10:53:24 UTC 2016
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/net: getifaddrs.3 getifaddrs.c
>
>
Date:Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:02:12 +0100 (CET)
From:Havard Eidnes
Message-ID: <20151104.140212.184674982...@uninett.no>
| 952, referred to from 1123.
That's just fine if your intent is to put a host name in HOSTS.TXT
That's all 952 applies to. If that is your intent,
Robert Elz wrote:
|Which standard?
RFC 1035 2.3.1 defines hostnames.
|ps: do go read section 11 of rfc2181 while you're pondering all of this.
I think RFC 6895 would then be for the better:
3.3.1. Label Types
At the present time, there are two categories of label types: data
labels a
> | So, what did we do by default: allow "_" in hostnames when that's
> | explicitly against standard, or not?
>
> Which standard?
952, referred to from 1123.
> There's RFC952 that specifies the format of HOSTS.TXT (from 1985).
> (The update in Hosts Requirements isn't material, one way or th
Date:Sun, 1 Nov 2015 23:45:36 -0800
From:Erik Fair
Message-ID: <56dd2b5f-26b1-40b7-bd84-103d3f255...@netbsd.org>
| So, what did we do by default: allow "_" in hostnames when that's
| explicitly against standard, or not?
Which standard?
There's RFC952 that specif
Erik Fair wrote:
|So, what did we do by default: allow “_” in hostnames when that’s exp\
|licitly against standard, or not? I read the patch in the PR and coul\
|dn’t make heads or tails of it.
fwiw i don't think this is generally true, my own one has
a DNS::verifyName() and that does
In article <56dd2b5f-26b1-40b7-bd84-103d3f255...@netbsd.org>,
Erik Fair wrote:
>So, what did we do by default: allow â_â in hostnames when thatâs
>explicitly against standard, or not? I read the patch in the PR and
>couldnât make heads or tails of it.
res_init() sets RES_NOCHECKNAME, but
oops, of course
?0[sdaoden@wales]$ git grep IS_ASCII_ master
master:modules/dns/config.h:#define _IS_ASCII_PRINTABLE(CHAR) ((CHAR) > 0x20
&& (CHAR) < 0x7F)
master:modules/dns/config.h:#define _IS_ASCII
So, what did we do by default: allow “_” in hostnames when that’s explicitly
against standard, or not? I read the patch in the PR and couldn’t make heads or
tails of it.
Erik
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 07:48, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:44:10PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > That adds a lot of restrictions on when UNSUPPORT_COMPILER.XXX can be
> > set. I don't think it's a good idea to do that.
>
> i don't understand this. can you explain it further?
The suggested pattern allows the variable to be se
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:49:41PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> >
> > > For completeness, it should be:
> > >
> > > .if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == "45" && ${MACHINE_CPU} == "arm"
> > > COPTS.getaddrinfo.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == "gcc" :? -fno-tree-ter :}
> > > COPTS.gethnameaddr.c+=${${ACTIVE_CC} =
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:49:41PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>
> > For completeness, it should be:
> >
> > .if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == "45" && ${MACHINE_CPU} == "arm"
> > COPTS.getaddrinfo.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == "gcc" :? -fno-tree-ter :}
> > COPTS.gethnameaddr.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == "gcc" :?
> For completeness, it should be:
>
> .if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == "45" && ${MACHINE_CPU} == "arm"
> COPTS.getaddrinfo.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == "gcc" :? -fno-tree-ter :}
> COPTS.gethnameaddr.c+=${${ACTIVE_CC} == "gcc" :? -fno-tree-ter :}
> .endif
why not just have:
.if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == "45" &&
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:20:35AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:54:37AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:17:37PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > > > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:54:37AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:17:37PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm
> > > > > > and gcc45
> > > > > > for workaround of a possibl
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:54:37AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:17:37PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm and
> > > > > gcc45
> > > > > for workaround of a possible optimazati
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:17:37PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm and
> > > > gcc45
> > > > for workaround of a possible optimazation bug.
> > >
> > > Please make sure this only is applied if the active
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:17:37PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm and
> > > gcc45
> > > for workaround of a possible optimazation bug.
> >
> > Please make sure this only is applied if the active CC is GCC.
>
> > Log Message:
> > Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm and gcc45
> > for workaround of a possible optimazation bug.
>
> Please make sure this only is applied if the active CC is GCC.
Isn't this enough?
---
.if defined(HAVE_GCC) && ${HAVE_GCC} == "45" && ${MACHINE_
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:59:00AM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> Log Message:
> Specify "-fno-tree-ter" to getaddrinfo.c and gethnamaddr.c on arm and gcc45
> for workaround of a possible optimazation bug.
Please make sure this only is applied if the active CC is GCC.
Joerg
In article <20101208020539.c6bd817...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: joerg
>Date: Wed Dec 8 02:05:39 UTC 2010
>
>Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/net: nslexer.l
>
>Log Message:
>input() is not used, so don't provide it.
>
On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Index: src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3
diff -u src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3:1.47 src/lib/libc/net/
getaddrinfo.3:1.48
--- src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3:1.47 Fri Oct 2 02:45:29 2009
+++ src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 Fri Oct 2 06:49:2
Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Fri Oct 2 07:41:08 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/net: getaddrinfo.3 getaddrinfo.c gethnamaddr.c
>
> Log Message:
> Revert a -> an changes: Adding an 'n' follows pronunciation, not writing.
Thanks.
25 matches
Mail list logo
