On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 4:46 AM matthew green wrote:
>
> > I did similar verification for gdb/dist/bfd also. I'd like to
> > sync {binutils,gdb}/dist/bfd, but there are huge diffs between
> > them. Most of them seem like binutils or gdb specific fixes,
> > but I may overlook something...
> >
> > It
> I did similar verification for gdb/dist/bfd also. I'd like to
> sync {binutils,gdb}/dist/bfd, but there are huge diffs between
> them. Most of them seem like binutils or gdb specific fixes,
> but I may overlook something...
>
> It must be nice if we could unify two libbfd's. The upstream
> uses t
On 2023/08/28 19:55, Valery Ushakov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 00:02:50 +, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Log Message:
binutils/bfd: Adjust blank line to reduce diff from upstream
Thanks a lot for these cleanups!
Do we need to apply similar cleanups to the bfd version in gdb?
(external/gpl3/gdb/
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 00:02:50 +, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> Log Message:
> binutils/bfd: Adjust blank line to reduce diff from upstream
Thanks a lot for these cleanups!
Do we need to apply similar cleanups to the bfd version in gdb?
(external/gpl3/gdb/dist/bfd)
-uwe
On 2021/04/22 10:09, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: rin
Date: Thu Apr 22 01:09:48 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd: elf32-ppc.c elf64-ppc.c
Log Message:
Fix regression where ld(1) is trapped into infinite loop when
linking bi
> Modified Files:
> src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd: Makefile.am Makefile.in
>
> Log Message:
> Fix `build.sh tools -j1` compilation, where bfd.h wasn't generated early
> enough.
FWIW, this looks right to me and not a hack. thanks.
.mrg.
