On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:45:58PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> I don't know. To help narrow down the possible differences, the
> autobuild system is running 5.1_STABLE, and invokes build.sh like
> this, in a freshly checked out source tree (from a date-based
> CVS checkout from anoncvs)
Paul Goyette wrote:
> My test-bed does not run any i386 builds. I do only amd64-on-amd64-host
Right, but the TNF testbed also does amd64-on-amd64-host builds,
and unlike yours, they are failing.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
Paul Goyette wrote:
My test-bed does not run any i386 builds. I do only amd64-on-amd64-host
Right, but the TNF testbed also does amd64-on-amd64-host builds,
and unlike yours, they are failing.
Ah, yes, I see that now.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
I see that it is also failing on my own testbed which is running the
same scripts as the TNF one, but not on Paul Goyette's, which is
running a different set of scripts.
My test-bed does not run any i386 builds. I do only amd64-on-amd64-host
Hi Reinoud,
Thank you for your quick response.
You wrote:
> Its weird that this comes up since i build tested it for amd64 (native) and
> i386 (cross om amd64) with success here on NetBSD 6.0_BETA2.
I see that it is also failing on my own testbed which is running the
same scripts as the TNF one,
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:28:00PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> The NetBSD-current/i386 release build has been broken for several days
> now, starting with your commits of 2012-06-30 15:03:56 UTC. It's
> failing with:
>
> --- kern-GENERIC_USERMODE ---
> cc1: warnings be
