In article <20150703192826.ga27...@netbsd.org>,
David Holland wrote:
>
>however, here's what it's about. %m is a wart: since it's not part of
>printf, it means you can't use printf to implement syslog(3), at least
>not without adding a bunch of gross hacks. Or alternatively (like the
>gnu folks d
On Friday 03 July 2015 19:28:26 David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > >> Modified Files:
> > >> src/usr.sbin/rtadvd: advcap.c if.c rrenum.c rtadvd.c
> > >>
> > >> Log Message:
> > >> Use %m in syslog(3) instead of %s strerror(3).
> >
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> >> Modified Files:
> >> src/usr.sbin/rtadvd: advcap.c if.c rrenum.c rtadvd.c
> >>
> >> Log Message:
> >> Use %m in syslog(3) instead of %s strerror(3).
> >
> > Was this really necessary? Last I remember we considered %m a leg
On Friday 03 July 2015 17:54:01 you wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:41:59PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Module Name: src
> > Committed By: roy
> > Date: Fri Jun 5 15:41:59 UTC 2015
> >
> > Modified Files:
> >src/usr.sbin/rtadvd: advcap.c if.c rrenum.c rtadv
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:41:59PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:roy
> Date:Fri Jun 5 15:41:59 UTC 2015
>
> Modified Files:
> src/usr.sbin/rtadvd: advcap.c if.c rrenum.c rtadvd.c
>
> Log Message:
> Use %m in syslog(3) instead of
