Am 14.03.2024 um 21:27 schrieb Robert Elz:
> Date:Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:53:13 +0100
> From:Roland Illig
> Message-ID: <9c7513f7-97b5-4d3b-9d66-dce483af7...@gmx.de>
>
> | I don't think the flags '+' and '0' make sense for strings, that's why I
> | decided to preserve
Date:Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:53:13 +0100
From:Roland Illig
Message-ID: <9c7513f7-97b5-4d3b-9d66-dce483af7...@gmx.de>
| I don't think the flags '+' and '0' make sense for strings, that's why I
| decided to preserve existing behavior.
But the change only affected thing
Am 14.03.2024 um 20:38 schrieb Robert Elz:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kre
> Date: Thu Mar 14 19:38:56 UTC 2024
>
> Modified Files:
> src/usr.bin/stat: stat.c
>
> Log Message:
> While the change in 1.51 certainly retained binary compat with
> what was in 1.50 (while silencing
On Nov 24, 11:49pm, dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/stat
| On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:11:36PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > >- (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%dd", prec > 9 ? 9 : prec);
| > >
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:11:36PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >- (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%dd", prec > 9 ? 9 : prec);
> >+ (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%dld", prec > 9 ? 9 : prec);
>
> perhaps %dlld?
Nope, that's the nsecs, which are "long".
I'm sort of
In article <20101124225754.6201e17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
David A. Holland wrote:
>- (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%dd", prec > 9 ? 9 : prec);
>+ (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%dld", prec > 9 ? 9 : prec);
perhaps %dlld?
> (void)strcat(lfmt, tmp);
>-
