Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2011-11-16 Thread Julio Merino
On 11/14/11 3:23 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: christos Date: Mon Nov 14 20:23:29 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/tests/util/sh: Makefile Added Files: src/tests/util/sh: t_evaltested.sh Log Message: Add a test for PR/45613 (eval failing in

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/make

2010-12-03 Thread Julio Merino
On 12/3/10 1:29 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: christos Date: Fri Dec 3 01:29:55 UTC 2010 Modified Files: src/tests/util/make: Makefile t_make.sh Added Files: src/tests/util/make: d_unmatchedvarparen.mk d_unmatchedvarparen.out Log Messa

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util

2010-06-16 Thread David Holland
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23:13AM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote: > > Well, I guess, but I would have expected it to install everything by > > default, as otherwise there could in theory be a problem with the sets > > it leaves off... > > Such as? The man pages not being accurate? web2a contain

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util

2010-06-15 Thread Antti Kantee
On Tue Jun 15 2010 at 05:00:59 +, David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:57:21PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote: > > > So I was meaning to ask: why does "anita test" not install /usr/share, > > > > Dunno. I'm guessing "it's not necessary to fullfill anita's mission". > > Well, I gue

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util

2010-06-14 Thread David Holland
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:57:21PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote: > > So I was meaning to ask: why does "anita test" not install /usr/share, > > Dunno. I'm guessing "it's not necessary to fullfill anita's mission". Well, I guess, but I would have expected it to install everything by default, as o

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util

2010-06-14 Thread Antti Kantee
On Sun Jun 13 2010 at 00:36:18 +, David Holland wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:15:02PM +, Antti Kantee wrote: > > Modified Files: > >src/tests/util: t_sort.sh > > > > Log Message: > > Make the test work on an installation without sharesrc. > > So I was meaning to ask: why do

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util

2010-06-12 Thread David Holland
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:15:02PM +, Antti Kantee wrote: > Modified Files: > src/tests/util: t_sort.sh > > Log Message: > Make the test work on an installation without sharesrc. So I was meaning to ask: why does "anita test" not install /usr/share, and what else is it randomly miss

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-07 Thread David Holland
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:30:27AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > | Ok, right now ksh diverges from sh on 32 of 75 cases, including > | several of the ones you changed. bash diverges on 3. > | > | Anyway, the test script now at least documents what the deal is, so > | I'm ok with leaving it

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-07 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Jun 6, 7:18pm, dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh | On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +, David Holland wrote: | > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:08:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > > | If it's more

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-06 Thread David Holland
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +, David Holland wrote: > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:08:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > | If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than > > | that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test > > | scri

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-06 Thread David Holland
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:08:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > | If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than > | that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test > | script should at least document what the correct behavior is. I have > | done

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-06 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Jun 6, 4:51am, dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh | If it's more important that the nightly test runs come up clean than | that it actually check for correct behavior so sh gets fixed, the test | script should at

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-05 Thread David Holland
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:53:36PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote: > >> # according to the standard, only failing *simple* commands > >> # cause an exit under -e. () is not a simple command. > >> - dcheck '(set -e; (set +e; false; echo OK; false); echo OK)' 'OK OK' > >> - echeck '(set -e; (se

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-03 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20100603164416.gd6...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za>, Alan Barrett wrote: >On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> Log Message: >> Pass all the set -e tests. >> >> To generate a diff of this commit: >> cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/tests/util/sh/t_set_e.sh > >Now the tests don't match

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/util/sh

2010-06-03 Thread Alan Barrett
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Christos Zoulas wrote: > Log Message: > Pass all the set -e tests. > > To generate a diff of this commit: > cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/tests/util/sh/t_set_e.sh Now the tests don't match the comments. > # according to the standard, only failing *simple* commands >