On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, matthew green wrote:
>+static int
>+internal_vw_printw(WINDOW *win, char *arg1, ...)
This code looks identical to that in wprintw(). Why does it
need to be duplicated under another name?
well, the test is about testing vw_printw() directly, not
wprintw().
Ah, of cours
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Brett Lymn wrote:
> >Modified Files:
> > src/tests/lib/libcurses/slave: curses_commands.c
> >
> >+static int
> >+internal_vw_printw(WINDOW *win, char *arg1, ...)
> >+{
> >+va_list va;
> >+int rv;
> >+
> >+va_start(va, arg1);
> >+rv = vw_printw(win, arg1,
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Brett Lymn wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libcurses/slave: curses_commands.c
+static int
+internal_vw_printw(WINDOW *win, char *arg1, ...)
+{
+ va_list va;
+ int rv;
+
+ va_start(va, arg1);
+ rv = vw_printw(win, arg1, va);
+ va_end
