On 1/07/2014 12:33 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:00:59AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:darrenr
>> Date:Sun Jun 29 04:00:59 UTC 2014
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/ipf: t_nat_parse.sh
>>
>> Log Message:
>> in2
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Darren Reed wrote:
On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: darrenr
Date: Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014
Added Files:
src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101
On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:darrenr
>> Date:Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014
>>
>> Added Files:
>> src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_
On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:darrenr
>> Date:Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014
>>
>> Added Files:
>> src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: darrenr
> Date: Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014
>
> Added Files:
> src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_6 in3_6 in4_6
> in5_6 in6_6 in8_6
> src/tests/ipf
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:00:59AM +, Darren Reed wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: darrenr
> Date: Sun Jun 29 04:00:59 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/ipf: t_nat_parse.sh
>
> Log Message:
> in2 is no longer a broken test case
It still fails in our test runs.
For what it's worth, it would appear that the problem with the
t_nat_exec tests is due to the use of the -b option in ipftest.
This apparently is supposed to produce only "brief" output, with a
pass/fail/nomatch indication. However, the "golden" test output files
appear to contain detailed ou
FWIW, this restores most of the ipfilter 5.1.1 tests that were disabled
after the re-import (back in March).
Remaining is one more test program, t_nat_exec, which has about 30
failing test cases (and 6 that succeed). I'm not sure how quickly I'll
be able to investigate these, but I'll try to
I think that this is failure of the tests. The tests were fixed at one
point, right before the import of new version was reverted. It appears
that the re-import has not quite caught up to the pre-revert state.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:38:50PM +0
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> >Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is willing to maintain
> >the ipf tests, these should be removed.
>
> I object to this. If ipf fails its tests, then the fact should be
> made clear in the test reports, not hidden b
On 27 March 2012 22:38, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/tests/ipf: t_filter_exec.sh t_filter_parse.sh t_nat_exec.sh
>> t_nat_ipf_exec.sh
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is willing
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/ipf: t_filter_exec.sh t_filter_parse.sh t_nat_exec.sh
t_nat_ipf_exec.sh
Log Message:
Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is willing to maintain
the ipf tests, these should be removed.
I object
12 matches
Mail list logo
