In article <20110214074822.ga...@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk>,
Matthias Scheler wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:37:12PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> >Do we really want to support "USE_LIB_SASL=cyrus"? Linking stuff in
>> >base again libraries from "pkgsrc" sounds like a big hack to me and
>> >wil
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:37:12PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >Do we really want to support "USE_LIB_SASL=cyrus"? Linking stuff in
> >base again libraries from "pkgsrc" sounds like a big hack to me and
> >will e.g. break cross compiling.
> I did not put it there, I found it there.
As far as I
In article <20110213204145.ga2...@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk>,
Matthias Scheler wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:12:55AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Sun Feb 13 05:12:55 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/external/
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:12:55AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sun Feb 13 05:12:55 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/ibm-public/postfix: Makefile.inc
>
> Log Message:
> change the variable to USE_LIB_SASL that can be s
Matthias Scheler writes:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:04:01AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Ah, well, if that has changed, then clearly it should be left in the new
>> setup. That does leave the question of whether we should obsolete the
>> /etc/postfix/postfix-script etc files in the set lis
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:04:01AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Ah, well, if that has changed, then clearly it should be left in the new
> setup. That does leave the question of whether we should obsolete the
> /etc/postfix/postfix-script etc files in the set lists.
Yes, we should. And I've al
Matthias Scheler writes:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:02:04PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Matthias Scheler writes:
>> > Log Message:
>> > Add makefile framework to build Postfix 2.6.2. Don't turn it on yet as
>> > the Postfix 2.6.2 binary doesn't work yet because it cannot
>> > find "/usr/
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:07:05PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Shouldn't all the programs go to bin/program instead at the top level?
Indeed. I'll fix that later.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:02:04PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Matthias Scheler writes:
> > Log Message:
> > Add makefile framework to build Postfix 2.6.2. Don't turn it on yet as
> > the Postfix 2.6.2 binary doesn't work yet because it cannot
> > find "/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script".
>
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
> Matthias Scheler writes:
>> Log Message:
>> Add makefile framework to build Postfix 2.6.2. Don't turn it on yet as
>> the Postfix 2.6.2 binary doesn't work yet because it cannot
>> find "/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script".
>
> That has to be /etc/postfix/postfix-sc
Matthias Scheler writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tron
> Date: Tue Jun 23 17:55:06 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/ibm-public/postfix: Makefile
> src/external/ibm-public/postfix/conf: Makefile
> src/external/ibm-public/postfix/postfix-etc: Makefile
Matthias Scheler writes:
> Log Message:
> Add makefile framework to build Postfix 2.6.2. Don't turn it on yet as
> the Postfix 2.6.2 binary doesn't work yet because it cannot
> find "/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script".
That has to be /etc/postfix/postfix-script (yes, I know, it is unusual,
but
In article <20090623150257.9023e17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Matthias Scheler wrote:
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: tron
>Date: Tue Jun 23 15:02:56 UTC 2009
>
>Added Files:
> src/external/ibm-public: Makefile
> src/external/ibm-public/postfix: Makefile Makefile.inc postfix2net
13 matches
Mail list logo
