In article <20180401232528.1e523f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Sevan Janiyan wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: sevan
>Date: Sun Apr 1 23:25:28 UTC 2018
>
>Modified Files:
> src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: libnetpgp.3
>
>Log Message:
>netpgp_t is a struct
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:16:47PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20100815163624.8645d17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:agc
> >Date:Sun Aug 15 16:36:24 UTC 2010
> >
> >Modified Files:
> >
In article <20100815163624.8645d17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: agc
>Date: Sun Aug 15 16:36:24 UTC 2010
>
>Modified Files:
> src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: misc.c packet-parse.c
> packet-show
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:56:07AM -0700, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> > src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: keyring.h packet-print.c
> > Added Files:
> > src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: mj.c mj.h
> >
> > Log Message:
> > add a minimalist JSON implementat
> Modified Files:
> src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: keyring.h packet-print.c
> Added Files:
> src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: mj.c mj.h
>
> Log Message:
> add a minimalist JSON implementation, and add a new function to access the
> data, and serialise it using
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010, David Holland wrote:
> I suppose the best available comprehensive solution is to use PRIu***
> garble in the code and then if necessary have autoconf figure out what
> the garble should expand to based on SIZE_MAX.
Yes.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Compromising the autoconfiguration not work properly in the name of
> > cross-compilation, though, is misguided. Can't you have it run the
> > test if it's not a cross-compiler and only if it is fall back to the
> > platfor
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:21:37PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:25:23AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > It would be better to make this a check which is size_t dependent,
> > > rather than platform-dependent.
> >
> > The idea is to black list platforms that d
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:25:23AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > It would be better to make this a check which is size_t dependent,
> > rather than platform-dependent.
>
> The idea is to black list platforms that don't do %zu and there is no
> way to do that without breaking cross-comp
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:18:11AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> It would be better to make this a check which is size_t dependent,
> rather than platform-dependent.
The idea is to black list platforms that don't do %zu and there is no
way to do that without breaking cross-compilation. It is sti
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 05:25:31AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 05:11:39AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:32:05AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > > > Even
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:34:12PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> You could easily enough have something like the following in autoconf
> to generate that:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> size_t foo = ~0;
> printf("#ifndef SIZE_MAX\n#define SIZE_MAX
In message: <20100626032531.ga14...@britannica.bec.de>
Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 05:11:39AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:32:05AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Alistair Crooks w
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 05:11:39AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:32:05AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > > Even in C99, the "%lu" method will work unless size_t is bigger than
> > > unsigned l
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:32:05AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > Even in C99, the "%lu" method will work unless size_t is bigger than
> > unsigned long *and* the value being printed exceeds ULONG_MAX, which
> > is
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> Even in C99, the "%lu" method will work unless size_t is bigger than
> unsigned long *and* the value being printed exceeds ULONG_MAX, which
> is unlikely to happen in practice.
Actually, it doesn't. This method br
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:40:26PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20100625183016.ac0be17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:agc
> >Date:Fri Jun 25 18:30:16 UTC 2010
> >
> >Modified Files:
> >
In article <20100625183016.ac0be17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: agc
>Date: Fri Jun 25 18:30:16 UTC 2010
>
>Modified Files:
> src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib: misc.c
>
>Log Message:
>Fix build problems on
18 matches
Mail list logo
