Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Why do we want to have another ad-hoc HTTP implementation? Wouldn't a
> small *CGI script be good enough?
Argument for a separate implementation: it runs as a standalone daemon
on a different port than the default for HTTP, as a decoupled service
from your normal httpd.
not really, i tried to shoehorn all of this into bozo, and it wasn't
willing to do it, and its cgi subsystem doesn't lend itself to this
kind of thing. i'm fairly intimate with most of bozo's internals,
too.
the server itself is not that large. if there's a common server-side
library that can be
Why do we want to have another ad-hoc HTTP implementation? Wouldn't a
small *CGI script be good enough?
Joerg
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:41:57AM +, Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: agc
> Date: Mon Mar 1 07:41:57 UTC 2010
>
> Added Files:
> src/cryp
