Robert Elz wrote:
> | How about the attached diff?
>
> Yes, that all looks good.
Ok, just committed that together with your other
suggestions.
Thanks for the feedback!
-Jan
Date:Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:50:06 -0500
From:Jan Schaumann
Message-ID:
| +In multi-column output
| +.Pq Fl C No or Fl x ,
| +a total sum for all the file sizes is output on a line before the listing.
should probably say (the first two lines there, and then):
a
Date:Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:50:06 -0500
From:Jan Schaumann
Message-ID:
That is, it looks good aside from this:
| +.Ns ( Fl C
| +or
| +.Fl x Ns ),
Ns as the first macro on a line makes no sense, there is
nothing to have no space after, try instead
.Pq Fl
Date:Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:50:06 -0500
From:Jan Schaumann
Message-ID:
| How about the attached diff?
Yes, that all looks good.
I wasn't sure the change to printcol() would be that simple,
but it looks good, the one to printacol() is exactly as I
imagined it!
kre
Robert Elz wrote:
> Is is the output format which is chosen (by option, or by
> using the rule to select the default) which affects what is
> output.
>
> And I believe that the -x and -C variation depending upon how
> many columns are output really is a bug, that should just be
> fixed.
How abo
Date:Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:32:01 -0500
From:Jan Schaumann
Message-ID:
| "If the output is to a terminal and results in multiple
| columns being printed, a total sum for all the file
| sizes is output on a line before the listing."
It actually has almost nothing t
Robert Elz wrote:
> It is more complex than that
Hmm. Maybe
"If the output is to a terminal and results in multiple
columns being printed, a total sum for all the file
sizes is output on a line before the listing."
?
(The fact that "total" is printed for '-l' whether or
not output goes to a
Date:Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:04:19 +
From:"Jan Schaumann"
Message-ID: <20241105040419.6c798f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
| Note that when '-s' is combined with '-1', the 'total' is _not_ printed.
It is more complex than that (though that is correct, and applies when the
-1 i
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, David Holland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:23:43PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >>Log Message:
> >>Add -O (only leaf files) and -P (print full path), from tls@
> >
> >Do any other ls implementations have such options? I like the
> >idea of being able to run "ls -ROP
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:23:43PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >>Log Message:
> >>Add -O (only leaf files) and -P (print full path), from tls@
> >
> >Do any other ls implementations have such options? I like the
> >idea of being able to run "ls -ROP1 ." instead of "find . type
> >f -pr
In article <20140221065057.gm1...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za>,
Alan Barrett wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>Modified Files:
>> src/bin/ls: ls.1 ls.c ls.h print.c
>>
>>Log Message:
>>Add -O (only leaf files) and -P (print full path), from tls@
>
>Do any other ls implementatio
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Modified Files:
src/bin/ls: ls.1 ls.c ls.h print.c
Log Message:
Add -O (only leaf files) and -P (print full path), from tls@
Do any other ls implementations have such options? I like the
idea of being able to run "ls -ROP1 ." instead of "fi
12 matches
Mail list logo