Hi Manuel,
On 23 October 2011 04:12, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: bouyer
> Date: Sat Oct 22 22:42:21 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/xen/xen [cherry-xenmp]: clock.c
>
> Log Message:
> More improvements:
> - Precise what tmutex protects
On 23 October 2011 00:51, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: bouyer
> Date: Sat Oct 22 19:21:57 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/x86/include [cherry-xenmp]: cpu.h
> src/sys/arch/xen/x86 [cherry-xenmp]: hypervisor_machdep.c
> src/s
On 31/08/2011, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 30.08.2011 14:53, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:cherry
>> Date:Tue Aug 30 12:53:46 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/i386/i386 [cherry-xenmp]: machdep.c
>> src/sys/arch/xen/x86
On 30.08.2011 14:53, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cherry
> Date: Tue Aug 30 12:53:46 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/i386 [cherry-xenmp]: machdep.c
> src/sys/arch/xen/x86 [cherry-xenmp]: cpu.c x86_xpmap.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add p
On 27 June 2011 12:23, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cherry
> Date: Mon Jun 27 10:23:21 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/xen/x86 [cherry-xenmp]: x86_xpmap.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add xpq locking around xpq-QUEUE_TLB_FLUSH()
>
sorry, that
On 6/26/2011 3:00 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/xen/include [cherry-xenmp]: intr.h
src/sys/arch/xen
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 05:57:37PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Also, you seem to assume that all x86 CPUs on today's market are muticore;
> > this is not true.
>
> No, I don't assume that. My reasoning is more like: this is one
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Also, you seem to assume that all x86 CPUs on today's market are muticore;
> this is not true.
No, I don't assume that. My reasoning is more like: this is one of those
seldom tested code paths; why can't there be a single source for
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:00:47PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: cherry
> > Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/xen/inclu
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cherry
> Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/xen/include [cherry-xenmp]: intr.h
> src/sys/arch/xen/xen [cherry-xenmp]: hypervisor.c
>
> Log M
10 matches
Mail list logo