Date:Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:27:53 +1100
From:matthew green
Message-ID: <16475.1540978...@splode.eterna.com.au>
| hmmm... feels like KERN_BOOTTIMESPEC should be added instead,
| and the compat restored for this old API.
|
| or should have been 9 years ago :-(
ps:
Date:Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:27:53 +1100
From:matthew green
Message-ID: <16475.1540978...@splode.eterna.com.au>
| hmmm... feels like KERN_BOOTTIMESPEC should be added instead,
| and the compat restored for this old API.
|
| or should have been 9 years ago :-(
A c
"Robert Elz" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kre
> Date: Tue Oct 30 21:18:39 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c
>
> Log Message:
> sysctl(KERN_BOOTTIME) is a struct timespec, not struct timeval
> and has eben since 2009.Adapt.
>
> NF
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:00:13AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > > >Do we really want to zap the CSRG sccsids? They are part of the
> > > >history.
> >
> > If someone is really interested in them, CVS still has the history.
> > Otherwise they are basically just noise.
> >
> > > Joerg rem
Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:17:26PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > In article <20140608053602.ga5...@netbsd.org>,
> > David Holland wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > Modified Files:
> > > > src/libexec/r
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:17:26PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20140608053602.ga5...@netbsd.org>,
> David Holland wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Modified Files:
> > > src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c
> > >
> > > Log Messa
In article <20140608053602.ga5...@netbsd.org>,
David Holland wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> > src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Remove !BSD and lint branches.
>
>Do we really want to zap the CSRG s
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c
>
> Log Message:
> Remove !BSD and lint branches.
Do we really want to zap the CSRG sccsids? They are part of the
history.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.o
