CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha

2025-02-02 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
Module Name:src Committed By: tsutsui Date: Sun Feb 2 20:11:02 UTC 2025 Modified Files: src/distrib/alpha: Makefile Added Files: src/distrib/alpha/liveimage: Makefile src/distrib/alpha/liveimage/emuimage: Makefile Log Message: Add "build.sh live-image" sup

CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha

2025-02-02 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
Module Name:src Committed By: tsutsui Date: Sun Feb 2 20:11:02 UTC 2025 Modified Files: src/distrib/alpha: Makefile Added Files: src/distrib/alpha/liveimage: Makefile src/distrib/alpha/liveimage/emuimage: Makefile Log Message: Add "build.sh live-image" sup

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2011-06-20 Thread J. Hannken-Illjes
Looks like an error in the `list' file: SPECIAL pingsrcdir distrib/utils/x_gzip SPECIAL pingsrcdir distrib/utils/x_ping -- Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany) On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2011-06-20 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> >Modified Files: > > src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk: list > > > >Log Message: > >Add -lbz2 and -llzma so that this links again. > > But that should not be needed for x_gzip. What needs those? Bad pasto in x_gzip line caused errors, but it has been fixed already anyway. --- Izumi Tsuts

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2011-06-20 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20110620230053.9893c17...@cvs.netbsd.org>, Havard Eidnes wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Module Name: src >Committed By: he >Date: Mon Jun 20 23:00:53 UTC 2011 > >Modified Files: > src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk: list > >Log Message: >Add -lbz2 and -llzma so that this li

UFS2 root support on sysinst (Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk)

2009-04-05 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
I wrote on source-changes-d@: > dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:24:07PM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > > Log Message: > > > Also put bootxx_ffsv2 into installation ramdisk. : > For bootxx_ffsv2, I'll move md_bootxx_name() and related stuff > from md.c

UFS2 root support on sysinst (Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk)

2009-04-05 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
Diff which contains 8 bit chars (with wrong charset) seems caught by filter, so resend message without diff. Here is a new patch, which includes .de translations from martin@: http://www.ceres.dti.ne.jp/~tsutsui/netbsd/sysinst-20090405.diff (even msg.mi.en should be improved, I guess..) --- orig

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2009-04-04 Thread David Holland
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 11:11:13AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > At the moment, I'd say it's not worth adding it if it's not there, and > > not worth taking it out if it is. > > It only had bootxx_ffs. > > Anyway, we have many inconsisntency for LFS in sysinst. > i386 doesn't have bootxx

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2009-04-04 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:24:07PM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > Log Message: > > Also put bootxx_ffsv2 into installation ramdisk. > > > > XXX: is it worth to put bootxx_lfs nowadays? > > At the moment, I'd say it's not worth adding it if it's not

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/alpha/instkernel/ramdisk

2009-04-04 Thread David Holland
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:24:07PM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > Log Message: > Also put bootxx_ffsv2 into installation ramdisk. > > XXX: is it worth to put bootxx_lfs nowadays? At the moment, I'd say it's not worth adding it if it's not there, and not worth taking it out if it is. If we get