On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Dec 23, 3:10pm, chacon.ja...@gmail.com (James Chacon) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet
>
> | Think we should go ahead and add the codes for 0,4 and 5?
>
> Well, are the ones for 1 and 3 correct
Think we should go ahead and add the codes for 0,4 and 5?
James
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2:20pm, chacon.ja...@gmail.com (James Chacon) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet
>
> | Unfortunately pfctl references the
> In article <20111223220300.9e70b17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> James Chacon wrote:
>>-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>> #define ICMP_PHOTURIS 40 /* security */
>>+#define ICMP_PHOTURIS_UNKNOWN_INDEX 1 /* Bad index */
>>+#define
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:02 PM, David Laight wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 05:42:20PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Can we just revert the past 2 commits? Changing:
(size_t)x -> x + 0u
does not look like an improvement to me. At least the first shows
the intent,
the second is just confusin
