What's wrong with printf("%s", NULL)? It produces '(null)', and at
least it's visible something is missing there. I think gcc 9.3 is
overly eager for this.
Is it correct to just omit the parameter altogether and change output format?
Jaromir
Le dim. 6 sept. 2020 à 04:41, matthew green a écrit :
On 05.09.2020 15:35, matthew green wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mrg
> Date: Sat Sep 5 13:35:55 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common:
> sanitizer_linux.cc sanitizer_linux.h sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cc
>
