Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:51:05 +0100
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID:
| sort(1)
| stat(1)
Those take no floating point input that I can see. For sort,
its only use of floats would be sorting files containing them,
for which (I assume) one would want and expec
In article <15294.1548463...@jinx.noi.kre.to>,
Robert Elz wrote:
>Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:45:46 +0700
>From:Robert Elz
>Message-ID: <22498.1548427...@jinx.noi.kre.to>
>
Linux does not accept 1,1 on the command line.
christos
[8:17pm] 125>cat foo.c
#include
#incl
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:05 +0300
From:Valery Ushakov
Message-ID: <20190125144905.gf18...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
| I think printf(1) comes closest.
|
| http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/printf.html
Yes, for printf, the input format is completely
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:45:46 +0700
From:Robert Elz
Message-ID: <22498.1548427...@jinx.noi.kre.to>
In a message I sent last night (the one where everything
was mixed up ...) I said:
| As for the other OS's, I believe that linux supports floating point,
| but I
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, matthew green wrote:
Log Message:
Move the netbsd32_machine32_hook into the main kernel with most of
the other hooks.
Although this hook might better belong in compat/netbsd32/ code,
there are some machines without a netbsd32 module (for example, i386
and sgimips) which sti
> Log Message:
> Move the netbsd32_machine32_hook into the main kernel with most of
> the other hooks.
>
> Although this hook might better belong in compat/netbsd32/ code,
> there are some machines without a netbsd32 module (for example, i386
> and sgimips) which still have consumers/users of this
On 25.01.2019 15:35, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Jan 25, 8:59pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/bin/sleep
>
> | Sounds entirely reasonable, except the standards won't say anything
> | relevant about sleep in particular, as only integers are supported ther
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 20:59:56 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> What other commands take floating point args on the command line
> (aside from awk assignments to vars, which are certainly intended to
> be locale specific) I'm not sure I can think of one.
I think printf(1) comes closest.
http://pubs.
Oops, messed up the ordering of that message badly ... but you can probably
rearrange the bits & pieces to make it make some sort of sense (too much cut
& paste into the wrong place, etc)
Any more on this (from me) will happen tomorrow.
kre
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:29:12 - (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| I think that we should consult what the standards say about all of this,
What POSIX says in general, about locales and how they should be
used is ...
The st
On Jan 25, 8:59pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/bin/sleep
| Sounds entirely reasonable, except the standards won't say anything
| relevant about sleep in particular, as only integers are supported there.
| The same is probably true of most other OS's (the
As a followup to what I just said, even though the FreeBSD code uses
sscanf (using %lf) which would handle locales, I do not see their code
doing a setlocale() call, which would mean that it is running in the C
locale, I believe, in which case it would handle '.' and nothing else.
However, it does
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:29:12 - (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| I think that we should consult what the standards say about all of this,
| what is the current practice on other OS's, and then decide and document
| the decision
On 25.01.2019 14:08, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:38:00 +0100
> From:Kamil Rytarowski
> Message-ID: <9790a289-8b3e-e57a-e4d8-c021aa7b1...@gmx.com>
>
> | I think it's better to keep an uniform way of handling separator in
> | basic command line tool
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:38:00 +0100
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <9790a289-8b3e-e57a-e4d8-c021aa7b1...@gmx.com>
| I think it's better to keep an uniform way of handling separator in
| basic command line tools and restrict locales to translations only.
Once
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:04:07 +0300
From:Valery Ushakov
Message-ID: <20190125110407.ge18...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
| I don't understand why the locale support in that
| particular place is not ripped out immediately when discovered.
Because it has been there a very
In article <9790a289-8b3e-e57a-e4d8-c021aa7b1...@gmx.com>,
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>
>> And as I said before, if this is to be changed, it needs to be via
>> a discussion in front of a wider audience than reads source-changes-d
>> and in particular messages with a subject that refers to one of
In article ,
Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
>
> I didn't know it! I've changed with it now.
>
> Thanks.
Thank you!
christos
On 25.01.2019 11:38, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:30:23 +0300
> From:Valery Ushakov
> Message-ID: <20190125093023.gc18...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
>
> | As someone who actually have to ecnoutner locales in daily life and
> | not just think about them si
OK, things are more sane now. I reverted this change, since it was
totally unnecessary. I need to get more sleep before doing some of
these things. :)
Thanks for keeping me honest!
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Paul Goyette wrote:
Just for sanity's sake, I will take another look at this change and
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 17:38:31 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:30:23 +0300
> From:Valery Ushakov
> Message-ID: <20190125093023.gc18...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
>
> | As someone who actually have to ecnoutner locales in daily life and
> | not just
Date:Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:30:23 +0300
From:Valery Ushakov
Message-ID: <20190125093023.gc18...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
| As someone who actually have to ecnoutner locales in daily life and
| not just think about them sitting in an ivory tower I don't understand
| why
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:48:26 +, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 09:30, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:43:10 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> >
> > > Date:Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:18:49 +0100
> > > From:Joerg Sonnenberger
> > > Mes
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 09:30, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:43:10 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> > Date:Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:18:49 +0100
> > From:Joerg Sonnenberger
> > Message-ID: <20190124151849.ga10...@britannica.bec.de>
> >
> > | This is over
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:43:10 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:18:49 +0100
> From:Joerg Sonnenberger
> Message-ID: <20190124151849.ga10...@britannica.bec.de>
>
> | This is overcomplicated and fragile, IMO. Can we just go back to the old
> |
25 matches
Mail list logo
