On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:46:29AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:33:19PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > > So we agree? Each compat should be independent.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Well, not totally independent! We have module
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:33:19PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
So we agree? Each compat should be independent.
Yes.
Well, not totally independent! We have module dependencies to enable
the use of common code.
It seems to me that
re-implement
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Maxime Villard wrote:
Le 15/08/2017 à 14:50, Martin Husemann a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
Why is it a bad idea re-implement the few compat_xx functions used in
compat_linux? This would eliminate the dependency, and a single modl
