Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> This commit breaks my kernel build.
> It seems that this commit does not fit with -current's format.
> Could you regenerate these files again?
I was running a build to reproduce the problem, when I noticed martin@
fixed it.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m.
Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> This commit breaks my kernel build.
> It seems that this commit does not fit with -current's format.
> Could you regenerate these files again?
What error do you get?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
Hi,
This commit breaks my kernel build.
It seems that this commit does not fit with -current's format.
Could you regenerate these files again?
Thank you.
From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" , Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:32:39 +
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: manu
> Date: Mon Jan 2 16:32:39
On 02.01.2017 18:54, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:18:49AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > > Historically exect() is used by debuggers to start debuggees. While
> > > it's equivalent to using PT_TRACE_ME followed by execve(), I think the
> > > result is that the new proc
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:18:49AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Historically exect() is used by debuggers to start debuggees. While
> > it's equivalent to using PT_TRACE_ME followed by execve(), I think the
> > result is that the new process first stops immediately after the exec
> > fini
