Maxime Villard writes:
> AFAICT, emacs is known to be buggy on netbsd.
That's strange, seeing as I've been using it daily since NetBSD 0.0,
with no problems. That's on i386, vax, mips, sparc, and amd64
platforms. (It's been a while since I had a vax, mips, or sparc system
with NetBSD on it, so
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> ? It probably means there is some kind of stupid assumption or hack in
> emacs. If you could send me the core, the binary and tell me which arch it
> is, that would be nice.
No, if there is a problem it is somewhere in crtstuff,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:28:56PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
> > Put a one-page redzone between userland and the PTE space on amd64 and
> > i386.
> >
> > The PTE space is a critical region that maps the page tree, and bugs have
> > been found in both amd64 and i386 where the kernel would
On Nov 26, 3:24am, n...@gmx.com (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel
| PT_READ_D and PT_READ_I read single int according to documentation.
|
| In tests io_read_d* io_read_i* data blocks are printed with appropriate
| PRIxN.
|
| I cannot spot a mistake in the te
On 25.11.2016 23:41, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article ,
> Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <20161125200105.5dbb4f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
>> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: kamil
>>> Date: Fri Nov 25 20:01:05 UTC 201
In article ,
Christos Zoulas wrote:
>In article <20161125200105.5dbb4f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
>Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>Module Name: src
>>Committed By: kamil
>>Date: Fri Nov 25 20:01:05 UTC 2016
>>
>>Modified Files:
>> src/tests/kernel: t_ptrace_wait.c
>>
>>Log Messa
In article <20161125200105.5dbb4f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: kamil
>Date: Fri Nov 25 20:01:05 UTC 2016
>
>Modified Files:
> src/tests/kernel: t_ptrace_wait.c
>
>Log Message:
>Fix several printf(3)-like functions usa
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> AFAICT, emacs is known to be buggy on netbsd.
Works well enough for my daily use on 7.0.2/amd64 and 7.99.42/amd64
(from about two weeks ago) and most releases in-between that I tried.
So I don't think this can be said in general.
Den 2016-11-25 kl. 13:04, skrev Maxime Villard:
Le 24/11/2016 à 14:28, Masanobu SAITOH a écrit :
Hi!
On 2016/11/19 18:22, Maxime Villard wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By:maxv
Date:Sat Nov 19 09:22:04 UTC 2016
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/include: vmparam.h
src
Le 24/11/2016 à 14:28, Masanobu SAITOH a écrit :
Hi!
On 2016/11/19 18:22, Maxime Villard wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: maxv
Date: Sat Nov 19 09:22:04 UTC 2016
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/include: vmparam.h
src/sys/arch/i386/include: vmparam.h
Log
10 matches
Mail list logo