In article <201501010346.t013klrb023...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>,
John Nemeth wrote:
> When adding this stanza to drivers, should you not set "error = 0;"
>after it just to be safe? It seems that some drivers aren't very
>clean in the way they deal with "error" and/or are not expecting
On Dec 31, 2:52pm, "Christos Zoulas" wrote:
}
} This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
}
} --_--=_14200555275200
} Content-Disposition: inline
} Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
}
} Module Name: src
} Committed By: christos
} Date:
"Frank Wille" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: phx
> Date: Wed Dec 31 18:43:18 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/ofppc/ofppc: mainbus.c
>
> Log Message:
> Make it compile with GCC48.
thanks.
no idea how this didn't trigger for me. we might need
this on netbs
In article <20141231101118.gb2...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:58:06PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Modified Files:
>> xsrc/external/mit/MesaLib/dist/src/mesa/main: format_utils.c
>>
>> Log Message:
>> The macros in this file generate a gigantic f
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:15:24AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +, David Laight wrote:
> > In this case I suspect removing __constfunc and making the
> > asm volatile will force correct sequencing.
>
> Check the commit history.
> Can we make only the hypve
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +, David Laight wrote:
> In this case I suspect removing __constfunc and making the
> asm volatile will force correct sequencing.
Check the commit history.
Can we make only the hypverisor call __constfunc?
Martin
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:58:06PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Modified Files:
> xsrc/external/mit/MesaLib/dist/src/mesa/main: format_utils.c
>
> Log Message:
> The macros in this file generate a gigantic function that takes a long time
> to compile and a ton of memory. Split it per data
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 04:34:42PM -0600, Dennis Ferguson wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec, 2014, at 12:52 , David Laight wrote:
> > Is that the correct fix?
> > Unless the rdpr actually accesses memory (don't think it does) then
> > then problem is probably a missing 'volatile' instead.
> >
> > Certainly t
