dholland@ wrote:
> ok, so naively I would think that *reordering* blocks wouldn't change
> their size, or at least not much... does anyone know where this 10%
> overhead comes from? Is it all jump instructions?
Probably it moves and aligns reordered "branch taken" blocks
at cacheline and there mi
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:14:02AM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/news68k/conf: GENERIC GENERIC_TINY
>
> Log Message:
> Use COPTS="-O2 -fno-reorder-blocks" as defined in sys.mk for userland.
>
> with "-O2":
>textdata bss dec hex filen