On 26 Nov, 2013, at 01:55 , Alan Barrett wrote:
>> -for (mp = mountlist.cqh_first; mp != (void*)&mountlist; mp = nmp) {
>> -nmp = mp->mnt_list.cqe_next;
>> +for (mp = mountlist.tqh_first; mp != (void*)&mountlist; mp = nmp) {
>> +nmp = mp->mnt_list.tqe_next;
>
> ... could be rewri
In article <20131126095505.gj1...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za>,
Alan Barrett wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>>Log Message:
>>Since mountlist is now a TAILQ, convert some missed usages
>>so things build again.
>
>It would be better if the callers were rewritten to use the
>queue.h macro
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Log Message:
Since mountlist is now a TAILQ, convert some missed usages
so things build again.
It would be better if the callers were rewritten to use the
queue.h macros instead of direct access to the struct members.
(Especially since the names of the s
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Comment out npf for now, as we can't have both NPF and PF in the
same kernel
It used to be possible to have npf and pf in the same kernel. The
kernel I am running now (built a few weeks ag
