On Nov 21, 10:51pm, y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libpthread
| > Replace the simple implementation of pthread_key_{create,destroy}
| > and pthread_{g,s}etspecific functions, to one that invalidates
| > values of keys in other threads when pthr
hi,
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Wed Nov 21 19:19:25 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libpthread: pthread_int.h pthread_specific.c pthread_tsd.c
>
> Log Message:
> Replace the simple implementation of pthread_key_{create,destroy}
> and pthread_{g,s}ets
On Nov 21, 1:36pm, i...@bsdimp.com (Warner Losh) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
| How could you guarantee this short of moving this into the kernel so you =
| could do all the comparisons while keeping all forks from happening?
You could not; this was more tongue-in-cheek.
On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:55 PM, David Laight wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:36:01PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
Is pkill() guaranteed to do an atomic traversal of the process list?
So it will kill something that keeps using fork() to change its pid.
>>>
>>> I don't think our libkvm off
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:36:01PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> Is pkill() guaranteed to do an atomic traversal of the process list?
> >> So it will kill something that keeps using fork() to change its pid.
> >
> > I don't think our libkvm offers that.
>
> How could you guarantee this short of
On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20121121200309.gn...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
> David Laight wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:20PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>> On Nov 22, 4:39am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
>>> -- Subject: re: CVS commit:
In article <20121121200309.gn...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:20PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> On Nov 22, 4:39am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
>> -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
>>
>> | this seems like a fairly big seman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:20PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Nov 22, 4:39am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
> -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
>
> | this seems like a fairly big semantic change to me.
> |
> | could you change it to take a new option to look in ar
On Nov 22, 4:39am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
| this seems like a fairly big semantic change to me.
|
| could you change it to take a new option to look in argv[0] instead
| of p_comm? p_comm is not changeable by the user.
You could
> In article <20121121080326.gl...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
> David Laight wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:52:02PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >> Module Name: src
> >> Committed By: christos
> >> Date: Tue Nov 20 22:52:02 UTC 2012
> >>
> >> Modified Files:
> >>s
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:07:04AM -0600, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> AFAIR softdeps were never enabled by default when they were around,
> it was always more of a "if you want performance, enable them" note
> somewhere.
I was suprised, but you are right.
Martin
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:52:04PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:17:43PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: jakllsch
> > Date: Tue Nov 20 20:17:43 UTC 2012
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/distrib/uti
In article <20121121080326.gl...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:52:02PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Tue Nov 20 22:52:02 UTC 2012
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/usr.bin/pkill: p
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:17:43PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jakllsch
> Date: Tue Nov 20 20:17:43 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/distrib/utils/sysinst: bsddisklabel.c
>
> Log Message:
> Don't enable WAPBL by default. It's far too dang
14 matches
Mail list logo
