On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Paul Goyette wrote:
The machine did not drop into ddb, it simply rebooted. Unfortunately it did
not leave a core dump behind, so I don't have much to look at just yet. When
I get home later today, I will try to get more info.
BTW, this occurred while running the ATF tes
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Paul Goyette wrote:
XXX I would appreciate if someone could test it under a real amd64 host
with an up-to-date kernel, so I can reasonably assume that the culprit is
Virtual Box and not our amd64 port (my test machine being off line I cannot
do it myself). Results from oth
XXX I would appreciate if someone could test it under a real amd64
host with an up-to-date kernel, so I can reasonably assume that the
culprit is Virtual Box and not our amd64 port (my test machine being
off line I cannot do it myself). Results from other arches would be a
plus too.
I just up
In article <20120419194815.b1dfd17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
David A. Holland wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: dholland
>Date: Thu Apr 19 19:48:15 UTC 2012
>
>Modified Files:
> src/usr.sbin/makefs/ffs: mkfs.c
>
>Log Message:
>Fix build failure reported by bracket.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:06:35PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>
> > > we've never had autoconfig run with the kernel lock AFAICT, so this
> > > assumption has never been true.
> >
> > So this is a bug. The contract was really that spl-locked drivers would
> > continue to work as is when fine-gra
> > we've never had autoconfig run with the kernel lock AFAICT, so this
> > assumption has never been true.
>
> So this is a bug. The contract was really that spl-locked drivers would
> continue to work as is when fine-grained locking was introduced.
there are no actual bugs or races here. this
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:46:35AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > we've never had autoconfig run with the kernel lock AFAICT, so this
> > > assumption has never been true.
> >
> > So this is a bug. The contract was really that
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > we've never had autoconfig run with the kernel lock AFAICT, so this
> > assumption has never been true.
>
> So this is a bug. The contract was really that spl-locked drivers would
> continue to work as is when fine-grained loc
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:39:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> FreeBSD started out with MPSAFE and then went to NEEDS_GIANT as flags for the
> drivers. I'm with Matthew: patch the drivers that are broken (or not known
> to be safe) and then you have a convenient thing to grep for when you want t
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:03:09AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>
> > > scsipi depends upon kernel lock. thus, callers should arrange for it
> > > to be held. since these are drivers calling, it is upto each driver
> > > to do this currently. this is what we've done with other problems we
> > >
10 matches
Mail list logo
