On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:47:48PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: rmind
> Date: Sat Feb 18 23:47:48 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/net: route.h
>
> Log Message:
> rt_setkey: remove invalid assert, sockaddr_dup() may fail if no memor
On Feb 19, 6:43am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/crash
|
| > I thought arm works. I am fixing mvme68k now. I am trying to make things
| > work without the kludge that is why I left it broken.
|
| can you please not do this? ie, don't commit
> I thought arm works. I am fixing mvme68k now. I am trying to make things
> work without the kludge that is why I left it broken.
can you please not do this? ie, don't commit broken code and leave
the tree broken for random ports for some time. if you see a break
that isn't trivial to fix, ple
On Feb 19, 1:18am, tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp (Izumi Tsutsui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/crash
| > I thought arm works.
|
| Daily build reports many arm ports
| (acorn32 cats evbarm hpcarm iyonix netwinder shark zaurus) fail
| http://releng.netbsd.org/builds/HEAD/201202171310Z/
In article <120219011842.m0113...@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
>> I thought arm works.
>
>Daily build reports many arm ports
>(acorn32 cats evbarm hpcarm iyonix netwinder shark zaurus) fail
>http://releng.netbsd.org/builds/HEAD/201202171310Z/
>after your commit at 201202162036Z.
> I thought arm works.
Daily build reports many arm ports
(acorn32 cats evbarm hpcarm iyonix netwinder shark zaurus) fail
http://releng.netbsd.org/builds/HEAD/201202171310Z/
after your commit at 201202162036Z.
If you commit changes without any tests, make sure to check result
in daily build log.
On Feb 19, 1:08am, tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp (Izumi Tsutsui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/crash
| > >http://releng.netbsd.org/builds/HEAD/201202171310Z/
| > >
| > >What checks did you do before committing your refactoring?
| >
| > None, this is why I waited after the branch. I a
> >http://releng.netbsd.org/builds/HEAD/201202171310Z/
> >
> >What checks did you do before committing your refactoring?
>
> None, this is why I waited after the branch. I am fixing sparc64 now.
Can you also fix arm and m68k? Or should I put kludge?
On m68k only sun3 (which has different pmap) ha
In article <120218180432.m0107...@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
>> In article <20120217122414.7254417...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
>> Martin Husemann wrote:
>> >-=-=-=-=-=-
>> >
>> >Module Name:src
>> >Committed By: martin
>> >Date: Fri Feb 17 12:24:14 UTC 2012
> In article <20120217122414.7254417...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> Martin Husemann wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:martin
> >Date:Fri Feb 17 12:24:14 UTC 2012
> >
> >Modified Files:
> > src/usr.sbin/crash: Makefile
> >
> >Log Message:
> >Fix build
10 matches
Mail list logo