hi,
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Wed Jan 25 00:28:36 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/sys: dup.2 fcntl.2 getsockopt.2 kqueue.2 open.2 pipe.2
> socket.2
> src/sys/kern: kern_descrip.c kern_event.c sys_descrip.c sys_generic.c
>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:07:47PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
> >> > > A detach function for the onboard flash probably makes no sense,
> >> > > so remove it.
> >> >
> >> > Sure it makes sense.
> >>
> >> Hmm... how do you detach it? With drvctl(8)? Why should you do that?
> >
> > Power con
David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:10:07PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
>> > > A detach function for the onboard flash probably makes no sense,
>> > > so remove it.
>> >
>> > Sure it makes sense.
>>
>> Hmm... how do you detach it? With drvctl(8)? Why should you do that?
>
> Power con
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:10:07PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
> > > A detach function for the onboard flash probably makes no sense, so
> > > remove it.
> >
> > Sure it makes sense.
>
> Hmm... how do you detach it? With drvctl(8)? Why should you do that?
Power consumption comes to mind...
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:10:07PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:52:11 -0600
> David Young wrote:
>
> > > Log Message:
> > > A detach function for the onboard flash probably makes no sense, so
> > > remove it.
> >
> > Sure it makes sense.
>
> Hmm... how do you detach it? Wi
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:52:11 -0600
David Young wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > A detach function for the onboard flash probably makes no sense, so
> > remove it.
>
> Sure it makes sense.
Hmm... how do you detach it? With drvctl(8)? Why should you do that?
> Has it been tested, though?
The detach
