-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It doesn't have to be ELF, I do it now on x86 for splash images. From
/boot I load a .png, .jpg, or .bmp and add it to the module list but mark
it as BI_MODULE_IMAGE (instead of BI_MODULE_ELF). I can then grab the blob
from the kernel -- see arch/
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06:26PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> On 11/23/11 11:47, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:tls
> >Date:Wed Nov 23 10:47:50 UTC 2011
> >
> >Modified Files:
> > src/distrib/sets/lists/etc: mi
> > src/etc/default
On Nov 23, 9:07am, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src
| On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:19:55AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > He does not want to write atf tests. In my opinion non-atf tests is better
| > than no tests.
|
| IMHO non-atf tests are just as u
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Paul Goyette wrote:
IMHO non-atf tests are just as useless as the whole src/regress hierachy
always was. BUT: finding someone to pick this new tests up and embed them
in atf should be easy.
I'll have a go at atf-ifying this over the upcoming 4-day holiday weekend (at
leas
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:19:55AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
He does not want to write atf tests. In my opinion non-atf tests is better
than no tests.
IMHO non-atf tests are just as useless as the whole src/regress hierachy
always was. BUT: find
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
I used to make heavy use of unionfs, and I had no problems. [...]
Do you mean `union'?
I mean "mount -t union".
`unionfs' was imported 2008/02/18 and was never enabled in any kernel config.
No, I haven't used that one. I didn't even know abou
On 11/23/11 11:47, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: tls
Date: Wed Nov 23 10:47:50 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/etc: mi
src/etc/defaults: rc.conf
src/etc/rc.d: Makefile
src/sbin/rndctl: rndctl.8 rndctl.c
On Nov 23, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> My vote would be to remove [unionfs]; it doesn't work and the only reason
>>> it was ever brought in had to do with alleged locking improvements.
>>
>> Is anyone using it?
>
> I used to make heavy use of unionfs, and I had no problems. (Th
My vote would be to remove [unionfs]; it doesn't work and the
only reason it was ever brought in had to do with alleged
locking improvements.
Is anyone using it?
I used to make heavy use of unionfs, and I had no problems. (That
was on a uniprocessor machine several years ago.) I sometimes
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:19:55AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> He does not want to write atf tests. In my opinion non-atf tests is better
> than no tests.
IMHO non-atf tests are just as useless as the whole src/regress hierachy
always was. BUT: finding someone to pick this new tests up and emb
10 matches
Mail list logo
