On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:17:43AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> do you have any plan on fs/unionfs? eg. remove it
My vote would be to remove it; it doesn't work and the only reason it
was ever brought in had to do with alleged locking improvements.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@n
hi,
do you have any plan on fs/unionfs? eg. remove it
YAMAMOTO Takashi
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: hannken
> Date: Mon Nov 21 18:29:23 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/fs/union: union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c union_vnops.c
>
> Log Message:
> Replace flag based
In article <2021161748.b09dd17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Chuck Silvers wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>gcc 4.5 on vax creates PLT stubs with an entry mask of 0xffc
>rather than 0 like gcc 4.1 did, so the sneaky assembly functions
>that "ret" without really returning now clobber their registers.
>adjust these
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/kern: subr_cprng.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Include MD only if defined(__HAVE_CPU_COUNTER).
> >
> > XXX: Why not timecounter(9) but deprecated cpu_counter32() and microtime(9)?
>
> microtime(9) is part of timecounter(9).
With extra overhead?
> There is no r
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:44:38PM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tsutsui
> Date: Mon Nov 21 13:44:38 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: subr_cprng.c
>
> Log Message:
> Include MD only if defined(__HAVE_CPU_COUNTER).
>
> XXX: Why not time
