On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:49:30AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20110817212950.gc16...@britannica.bec.de>,
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party
> >scripts that parse the output of unzip?
> >
>
> I thought about that, but
In article <20110817212950.gc16...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party
>scripts that parse the output of unzip?
>
I thought about that, but where does one find such scripts? Providing
a flag to make backwards compatibl
In article <20110817212805.gb16...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>Could you please stop randomly changing 3rd party code without
>contacting the maintainer?
Unless the rules have changed, for simple compilation fixes we don't do that.
Otherwise the overhead of doing so would be t
Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party
scripts that parse the output of unzip?
Joerg
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:37:40AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Wed Aug 17 13:37:40 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
>
Could you please stop randomly changing 3rd party code without
contacting the maintainer?
Joerg
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:30:14AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Wed Aug 17 09:30:14 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/bsd/
> > Log Message:
> > build GMP, MPFR and MPC as private libraries just for GCC. don't
> > install the headers or librarys into the system.
>
> in lib/Makefile should this really be
>
> .if (${MKGCC} != "no") && ${HAVE_GCC} >= 45
>
> rather than
>
> .if defined(HAVE_GCC) && ${HAVE_GCC} >= 45
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, matthew green wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mrg
> Date: Thu Jul 21 03:13:32 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/compat/amd64/i386: bsd.i386.mk
> src/compat/mips64/64: bsd.64.mk
> src/compat/mips64/o32: bsd.o32.mk
> src/compat/sparc64
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:19:02AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere?
> Dunno - I just needed a quick build fix. Manu?
Yes, there was a missing header, I just fixed it (and rolled back
the prototype in vfs_syscalls.c).
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:17:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:31:27AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> >src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > add missing prototype
>
> shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere?
Dunno -
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:31:27AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c
>
> Log Message:
> add missing prototype
shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere?
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
10 matches
Mail list logo