On Jul,Thursday 21 2011, at 8:15 PM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:45:55AM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>> I believe this is a general gdb complaint, not specific to atf. I've
>> run into this issue as well - there are some workarounds (threaded
>> debugging works somewhat on
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:45:55AM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> I believe this is a general gdb complaint, not specific to atf. I've
> run into this issue as well - there are some workarounds (threaded
> debugging works somewhat on core dumps), but it's a giant pain given
> than one of the key co
On 7/21/11 10:33 AM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 7/21/11 4:49 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
However, from my very practical experience (from all relevant sides:
running
tests, writing/extending them, and most importantly: fixing the troubles
they show) it is not the framework that causes most problems
On 7/21/11 2:11 AM, Iain Hibbert wrote:
PS the "predictable consequence" that you cannot fold in external test
programs did not come true, see tests/lib/libevent/t_event.sh for example,
though I note that the number of libevent tests are misrepresented in the
atf-total since the test program prin
On 7/21/11 4:49 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:11:56AM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
I thought that I agreed with Jukka, it seemed to be a complaint with no
specific content except that you were uncomfortable (unfamilar?) with
atf.
I'm mostly with Iain here, though I have a
On 7/20/11 10:35 PM, David Holland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:49:34PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> A lot of empty talk here.
>
> What is exactly your problem?
You asked, I tried to explain, you describe it as "empty talk". What
are you expecting, a gigantic patch?
Anyway, I gue
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:11:56AM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> So, what exactly is your problem? I don't understand your complaint that
> "atf is too intrusive"; it is a test framework and all the code that it
> runs is written to automatically run within that framework.. also, the
> pretty repo
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:11:56AM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> I thought that I agreed with Jukka, it seemed to be a complaint with no
> specific content except that you were uncomfortable (unfamilar?) with
> atf.
I'm mostly with Iain here, though I have a vague idea and think I partly
understan
